Reserve at Paxton Creek, LP v. Susquehanna Twp. Authority
── Reserve at Paxton Creek, LP v. Susquehanna Twp. Authority ──
Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date: May 15, 2026
Author: Covey
Category: General
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Reserve at Paxton Creek, LP :
:
v. :
:
Susquehanna Township Authority, : No. 55 C.D. 2025
Appellant : Argued: April 13, 2026
BEFORE: HONORABLE ANNE E. COVEY, Judge
HONORABLE LORI A. DUMAS, Judge
HONORABLE STELLA M. TSAI, Judge
OPINION NOT REPORTED
MEMORANDUM OPINION BY
JUDGE COVEY FILED: May 15, 2026
The Susquehanna Township (Township) Authority (Authority) appeals
from the Dauphin County Common Pleas Court’s (trial court) September 3, 2024
order (docketed September 4, 2024) granting the Reserve at Paxton Creek, LP’s
(Reserve LP) request for mandamus and declaratory relief. The Authority presents
three issues for this Court’s review: whether the trial court erred by: (1) both failing
to find that the Authority uses a flat-rate billing system for residential customers,
and by concluding that 180 gallons per day (gpd) was the amount the Authority
billed under Act 43 of 2021 (Act 43);1 (2) failing to defer to the Authority in
1
Act 43 added the following language to Section 5607(d)(9) of the Municipality
Authorities Act (MAA):
The owner of multiple residential units that are served by a single
water meter may periodically request the authority to adjust the
amount billed by showing a minimum of [5] consecutive years of
actual usage data to determine if the amount billed exceeds the
actual usage by 30% or more. If the usage data shows that an
adjustment is needed, the authority shall appropriately adjust the
billing and use the adjusted amount going forward. When
calculating the new amount, the authority may include up to 10%
determining the sewer rates and actual water usage by the Township’s residential
users; and (3) finding that the Authority did not follow a reasonable and informed
approach to effectuate Act 43. After review, this Court reverses.
Reserve LP owns a multi-family apartment complex in the Township
known as Reserve at Paxton (Paxton). Paxton currently has 160 apartment units and
one clubhouse that are connected to the sanitary sewer system run by the Authority.
Paxton also has a single water meter for use in water billing. On January 9, 2023,
Reserve LP filed an application (Application) seeking a sewer rate reduction under
Act 43, which provides, in relevant part:
The owner of multiple residential units that are served by
a single water meter may periodically request the authority
to adjust the amount billed by showing a minimum of [5]
consecutive years of actual usage data to determine if the
amount billed exceeds the actual usage by 30% or more.
53 Pa.C.S. § 5607(d)(9) (emphasis added).
On May 8, 2023, the Authority denied the Application, explaining:
A thorough review and analysis of the water usage data
and billing invoices submitted on behalf of [Paxton],
which consists of 160 apartment units[] was . . .
undertaken. The [Authority’s] Board finds that such data
establishes an average of 82.6 [gpd] with respect to each
residence.
A review was then also made of Capital Region Water and
Suez Water Pennsylvania, now known as Veolia, water
usage for all residential customers in [the] Township
service area for the [5]-year period in question. The
Authority has determined that on average each domestic
residence (i.e. [Equivalent Dwelling Unit] (EDU) in [the]
Township uses 89 [gpd].
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}