State of New Jersey in the Interest of K.W., a Juvenile
── State of New Jersey in the Interest of K.W., a Juvenile ──
Court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date: May 14, 2026
Category: General
RECORD IMPOUNDED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the
internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited . R. 1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2976-24
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
IN THE INTEREST OF K.W.,
a juvenile.1
_________________________
Submitted May 5, 2026 – Decided May 14, 2026
Before Judges Perez Friscia and Vinci.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey,
Chancery Division, Family Part, Essex County, Docket
No. FJ-07-0710-25.
Jennifer N. Sellitti, Public Defender, attorney for
appellant K.W. (Susan L. Romeo, Assistant Deputy
Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief).
Theodore N. Stephens, II, Essex County Prosecutor,
attorney for respondent State of New Jersey (Matthew
E. Hanley, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the
brief).
PER CURIAM
1
We use initials to protect the identity of the juvenile involved in this case. See
R. 1:38-3(d).
Defendant K.W. appeals from the Family Part adjudication of delinquency
entered after a plea for conduct which, if committed by an adult, would
constitute: second-degree unlawful possession of a handgun, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-
5(b)(1); fourth-degree possession of prohibited ammunition (hollow-nose
bullets), N.J.S.A. 2C:39-3(f)(1); and third-degree resisting arrest, N.J.S.A.
2C:29-2(a)(3)(A). K.W. challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to
suppress. Having reviewed the record, parties' arguments, and applicable law,
we affirm.
I.
We summarize the facts and procedural history from the record. On
November 25, 2024, following his arrest, the State filed a juvenile delinquency
complaint against K.W. for weapons-related and resisting arrest charges. K.W.
was sixteen years of age at the time he committed the offenses.
K.W. moved to suppress the evidence seized after his arrest and the court
held oral argument. During argument, K.W. asserted suppression was warranted
because he was arrested without probable cause, noting he was not a target of
the underlying criminal investigation. He highlighted the State did not charge
him with any earlier offense. He moved for an evidentiary hearing, alleging
A-2976-24
2
there were material issues of fact in dispute surrounding the lawfulness of the
seizure, which the court granted.
On February 11, 2025, the court held an evidentiary hearing. The State
presented Officer Brandon J. Cunha as a witness, who testified that on
November 25, 2024, he was working for the New Jersey State Police (NJSP)
Auto Theft Taskforce. Cunha was with other officers conducting surveillance
of two target individuals in Newark. The officers observed the two target
individuals and a third person, later identified as K.W., enter a restaurant. Cunha
entered the restaurant to arrest the two target individuals. Cunha had knowledge
that the target individuals previously had exhibited "dangerous behavior," which
caused him to approach the restaurant arrest "with a heightened sense towards
caution." Upon entry, he observed one target sitting on a bench next to K.W.
Cunha directed the target and K.W. not to move. After K.W. moved his hands
upwards, Cunha "tried to pin [K.W.'s] hands to [his] bod[
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}