Michael Wilmot v. New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority
── Michael Wilmot v. New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority ──
Court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date: May 15, 2026
Category: General
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the
internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited . R. 1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2072-24
MICHAEL WILMOT,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
NEW JERSEY HIGHER
EDUCATION STUDENT
ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY,
Respondent-Respondent.
_________________________
Submitted May 5, 2026 – Decided May 15, 2026
Before Judges Rose and DeAlmeida.
On appeal from the New Jersey Higher Education
Student Assistance Authority.
Michael Wilmot, self-represented appellant.
Jennifer Davenport, Attorney General, attorney for
respondent (Sookie Bae-Park, Assistant Attorney
General, of counsel; Vijayasri G. Aryama, Deputy
Attorney General, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Michael Wilmot appeals from a January 30, 2025 decision of the New
Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority (NJHESAA), rejecting
his incomplete application for the Home and Community Based Services
Provider Loan Redemption Program (Program). Because we conclude the
NJHESAA's decision "is supported by sufficient credible evidence on the record
as a whole," R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(D), we affirm.
We summarize the facts from the record before the NJHESAA. The
Program was federally funded and administered by the NJHESAA, which
accepted applications for one month only, between July 1, 2024 and July 31,
2024. Under the "one-time" Program, successful applicants were awarded up to
$50,000 in student loan redemption.
To qualify for the Program, applicants were required to meet certain
criteria and submit an online application, including a completed four-page
employer certification form. Instructions for completing this form were
expressly stated on the first page. Pertinent to this appeal, instruction number
four advised: "Before submission, ensure that the applicant and HR
representative both provide a hand[]written signature on the form." Instruction
number five advised: "Upload the completed and signed form with the online
application no later than July 31, 2024."
A-2072-24
2
On July 3, 2024, Wilmot applied to the Program by uploading an online
application and two pages of the four-page employer certification form. Wilmot
did not include section two of the form, titled: "Section 2: To Be Completed
By The Human Resources Representative."
Five months later, on December 13, 2024, the NJHESAA issued a written
decision deeming Wilmot "ineligible for the [Program] due to: Agency Provider
or Specific Site Eligibility Status."
By email dated December 26, 2024, Wilmot appealed. In his email,
Wilmot provided additional information, including his employer's license .
On January 17, 2025, the NJHESAA issued a written decision.
Acknowledging Wilmot met "Agency Provider or Specific Site Eligibility
Status," the agency nonetheless determined Wilmot "remain[ed] ineligible to
participate in the Program." The NJHESAA found the application was
incomplete in view of a "Missing or Incomplete Employer Certification."
By email dated January 27, 2025, Wilmot requested "a copy of the
employment verification form." Wilmot explained: "It seems in my original
copy it did not scan double sided, and I disposed of the original copy. If you
could please se
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}