In re Interest of Ryder K. & Parker K.
── In re Interest of Ryder K. & Parker K. ──
Court: Nebraska Court of Appeals
Date: May 12, 2026
Category: General
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL
(Memorandum Web Opinion)
IN RE INTEREST OF RYDER K. & PARKER K.
NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION
AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E).
IN RE INTEREST OF RYDER K. & PARKER K., CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE.
STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE,
V.
LATESHA K., APPELLANT.
Filed May 12, 2026. Nos. A-25-704, A-25-705.
Appeals from the County Court for Hall County: ALFRED E. COREY III, Judge. Affirmed.
John D. Icenogle, of Bruner Frank Schumacher Husak, L.L.C., for appellant.
Anna M. Brokaw, Hall County Deputy County Attorney, for appellee.
MOORE, PIRTLE, and WELCH, Judges.
MOORE, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Latesha K. appeals from two separate orders of the Hall County Court sitting as a juvenile
court, terminating her parental rights to two of her children. We have consolidated the juvenile
cases and upon our de novo review of the record, we affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Latesha is the mother of Ryder K., born in August 2020; and Parker K., born in November
2022. Latesha has additional children who are not at issue in this appeal. Paxton, born in September
2021, was removed with Parker, and Braxton was born during the pendency of this juvenile case
in July 2024. Ryder and Parker have different fathers. Though the fathers’ parental rights were
also terminated, they are not parties to this appeal and will be discussed only as necessary to the
resolution of the current appeal by Latesha.
-1-
1. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Ryder was removed from Latesha’s care in March 2023 after he was hospitalized due to
symptoms relating to his childhood nephrotic syndrome. A petition was filed on March 29 to
adjudicate Ryder pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-247(3)(a) (Reissue 2016). The petition alleged
that Ryder had been diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome, which requires him to receive specific
care to keep the condition in remission and prevent serious medical complications. The petition
alleged that despite education and training opportunities, Latesha had not been able to clearly state
the importance of his care and dietary restrictions, denied the importance of that care, and failed
to follow the prescribed treatment. Latesha had also allegedly failed to properly administer Ryder’s
necessary medication during his recent hospitalization.
Parker was removed from Latesha’s care in July 2023 following a report that Latesha and
her children were living in unsanitary conditions. A petition was filed on July 13 to adjudicate
Parker and Paxton, pursuant to § 43-247(3)(a). The petition alleged that Department of Health and
Human Services (the Department) caseworker Angela Brown had recently made an unannounced
home visit to a hotel room that Latesha and her children were staying in. The petition alleged that
Brown noted a pungent odor coming from the room and that the floor was littered with refuse. The
petition alleged that it was challenging to walk around the hotel room due to the amount of excess
trash and clothing on the floor, some of which appeared to have insects or feces in it. Latesha
claimed to have bathed both Parker and Paxton recently, but Parker allegedly had dirt and crusted
milk on his neck, which had caused a rash, and open sores due to a severe diaper rash. Paxton
allegedly had matted hair and dirt all over his body. The petition alleged that the housing conditions
were unsuitable for children, particularly for the ages of Parker and
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}