Xavier Heckstall v. State of Indiana
── Xavier Heckstall v. State of Indiana ──
Case No.: 22A-PC-00119
Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date: June 30, 2022
Author: Judge Cale Bradford
County of Origin: Marion
Category: Criminal
Decision: Affirmed
Judge Najam and Judge Bailey concur
Our memorandum decision in Heckstall’s direct appeal, which was handed
down on March 15, 2018, instructs us on the underlying facts and procedural
history leading to this post-conviction appeal:
Heckstall, T.C., and T.C.’s three children lived together in a
three-bedroom apartment in Indianapolis. On July 26, 2016,
Heckstall and T.C. began arguing. At some point, Heckstall took
T.C. to an apartment next door, which belonged to Heckstall’s
cousin. The couple continued arguing.
← Back to Cale Bradford's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}