Lawrence v. Gilby's Pizza Craven, L.L.C.
── Lawrence v. Gilby's Pizza Craven, L.L.C. ──
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date: May 15, 2026
Author: Myron Duhart
Category: General
[Cite as Lawrence v. Gilby’s Pizza Craven, L.L.C., 2026-Ohio-1797.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
HURON COUNTY
David Lawrence, et al. Court of Appeals No. H-25-025
Appellees Trial Court No. CVH 2025-486
v.
Gilby’s Pizza Craven LLC., et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Appellants Decided: May 15, 2026
*****
Bryan Lamb, for appellees.
Brian Donnamiller, for appellants.
* * * **
DUHART, J.
{¶ 1} This case is before the court on appeal from the October 2, 2025 judgment of
the Huron County Common Pleas Court. Because the trial court failed to hold a hearing,
as required by statute, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Assignment of Error
The trial court committed a revers[i]ble error in finding that Chapter
2747 was inapplicable to the claim of defamation as asserted in the
Plaintiffs/Appellees’ Complaint.
Background
{¶ 2} On July 21, 2025, appellees, David and Donna Lawrence, filed a complaint
alleging that they executed a “Purchase Agreement” with appellants, Gilby’s Pizza
Craven LLC and Bradley Gilbert, whereby appellees were identified as the sellers and
appellants were identified as the purchasers, and that controversies had arisen regarding
the purchase agreement. Appellees’ complaint includes a claim seeking a declaratory
judgment that the purchase agreement is void and an order for appellants to vacate the
premises (Count 1), a claim for defamation (Count 2), and a request for emergency
injunctive relief “ordering [appellants] to cease posting false and defamatory statements
online, or anywhere publicly, regarding [appellees’] businesses and personal
information” (Count 3). The defamation claim includes the following allegations:
23. [Appellees] own and operate the business Scoops and Brews located at
78 Benedict Ave., Norwalk, Ohio, which is next door to Gilby’s Pizza
Cravin.1
24. Scoops and Brews was opened at its location in March, 2025.
25. In April, 2025, [appellants] began posting online commentary to the
Facebook page “the real talk of Norwalk” about [their] frustration with
[appellees].
26. [Appellants] falsely and recklessly made statements about the damage
to the property at 64 Benedict Ave., and the nature of the part[ies’]
conversations regarding the property.
27. Subsequently, the public seeing [appellants’] Facebook posts wanted to
know the identity of the [appellees] and a copy of [appellees’] identity,
businesses, and personal address were posted [on] the “real talk of
Norwalk” Facebook page under [appellants’] comments.
28. On April 17, 2025, the undersigned counsel mailed a cease-and-desist
letter to [appellants] demanding [they] stop the above harassing and
defamatory behavior. . . .
1
We note that Craven is sometimes spelled Craven, and sometimes Cravin. In
our quotes, we have used the spelling used by the parties.
2.
29. However, [appellants] continued to post false statements to the public
online Facebook page regarding [appellees].
30. Public responses to [appellants’] posts clearly show that [appellees]
lost business at Scoops and Brews because of [appellants’] online
comments.
31. Members of the general public have come to [appellees’] business,
Scoops and Brews, questioning [appellees] about Gilby’s Pizza Cravin, the
building at 64 Benedict Ave., Norwalk, Ohio.
32. [Appellants] published
← Back to Myron Duhart's profile
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}