All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion May 17, 2026

United States v. Percy Tucker

── United States v. Percy Tucker ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Date: May 15, 2026 Category: General USCA4 Appeal: 25-6716 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/15/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6716 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PERCY JAMES TUCKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:09-cr-00182-AWA-DEM-1) Submitted: May 5, 2026 Decided: May 15, 2026 Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Percy James Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6716 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/15/2026 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Percy James Tucker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for early termination of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282 (4th Cir. 1999) (reviewing denial of § 3583(e) motion for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Tucker, No. 2:09-cr-00182-AWA- DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
CourtListener · May 15, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}