Antonio Coatley v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
── Antonio Coatley v. Commonwealth of Kentucky ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Date: May 15, 2026
Author: Combs
Category: General
RENDERED: MAY 15, 2026; 10:00 A.M.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals
NO. 2025-CA-0491-MR
ANTONIO COATLEY APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT
v. HONORABLE JULIE KAELIN, JUDGE
ACTION NO. 13-CR-001845
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLEE
OPINION
AFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE: COMBS, KAREM, AND MCNEILL, JUDGES.
COMBS, JUDGE: Appellant, Antonio Coatley, appeals from an Order of the
Jefferson Circuit Court, Division Four, revoking his probation. After our review,
we affirm.
In 2013, Coatley was indicted on charges of first-degree robbery, first-
degree burglary, and first-degree unlawful imprisonment. The Commonwealth
offered him a plea agreement if he were to plead guilty to amended charges of
facilitation of first-degree robbery, facilitation of first-degree burglary, and fourth-
degree assault -- recommending in exchange a total sentence of ten-years’
incarceration with Coatley to pay approximately $1,300 in restitution to the victim.
The Commonwealth also recommended that Coatley be placed on pre-trial
diversion for five years. On February 4, 2014, Coatley accepted the offer and
moved to enter a guilty plea. The trial court sentenced Coatley to five years of pre-
trial diversion and required him to pay $1,365 in restitution in the amount of
$26.25 per month, commencing May 1, 2014. (Trial Record (TR) 46–47.)
In November 2016, the Commonwealth filed a motion to void his pre-
trial diversion because Coatley had incurred a new felony arrest. In January 2017,
the Commonwealth filed the supplemental ground of absconding in support of its
motion to revoke. In October 2017, the trial court removed Coatley from pre-trial
diversion and placed him on probation. Over the next several years, the
Commonwealth filed multiple motions to revoke, all of which were resolved short
of revoking Coatley’s probation.
On February 25, 2025, the Commonwealth filed the motion now
before us to revoke probation based upon a new felony offense -- first-degree
strangulation and fourth-degree assault (domestic violence). On March 4, 2025,
the trial court conducted a revocation hearing at which Officer Josh Thompson
testified.
-2-
Prior to the commencement of the hearing, defense counsel moved for
a continuance, arguing that the case was very new and that defense counsel was
still working with his investigator. Defense counsel also made a motion to remand
under Marshall v. Commonwealth, 638 S.W.2d 288 (Ky. App. 1982), alleging
issues with confrontation. Defense counsel explained that he had just come from a
revocation hearing in Division Two1 and that Officer Thompson, who testified
there as well, had not taken the report from the victim but had only reviewed body-
cam footage from the officers who took the report.
The Commonwealth responded that it wanted to move forward
“today.” The Commonwealth explained that this case had been before the court
for an issue of failure to pay restitution and that Coatley then incurred a new
offense. That the Commonwealth observed that it had complied with due process
by giving notice of the new allegations by filing the (subject) supplemental motion
to revoke and that, therefore, defense counsel had ample time to prepare.2
Regarding proof, the Commonwealth stated that the court could give whatever
1
Earlier that day, Coatley had a revocation hearing in another case, Jefferson Circuit Court,
Division Two, No. 23-CR-0204, at which Officer Thompson also testified. The trial court
en
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}