People v. Brown
── People v. Brown ──
Court: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date: May 14, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: This order was filed under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23 and is not
precedent except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
2026 IL App (3d) 240492-U
Order filed May 14, 2026
____________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
THIRD DISTRICT
2026
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ) Appeal from the Circuit Court
ILLINOIS, ) of the 12th Judicial Circuit,
) Will County, Illinois,
Plaintiff-Appellee, )
) Appeal No. 3-24-0492
v. ) Circuit No. 18-CF-601
)
DARRIUS D. BROWN, ) Honorable
) Carmen Julia Goodman,
Defendant-Appellant. ) Judge, Presiding.
____________________________________________________________________________
JUSTICE HOLDRIDGE delivered the judgment of the court.
Justices Brennan and Anderson concurred in the judgment.
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
¶1 Held: The circuit court did not err in summarily dismissing the defendant’s postconviction
petition at the first stage of proceedings.
¶2 The defendant, Darrius D. Brown, appeals from the first-stage dismissal of his
postconviction petition. He argues that the Will County circuit court erred when it summarily
dismissed his petition where it pleaded the gist of a claim that trial counsel provided ineffective
assistance when he failed to investigate a potential defense regarding the cause of the victim’s
injuries.
¶3 I. BACKGROUND
¶4 On April 18, 2018, the State indicted the defendant on two counts of aggravated battery
(720 ILCS 5/12-3.05(a)(1), (f)(1) (West 2018)), two counts of aggravated domestic battery
(id. § 12-3.3(a)), unlawful restraint (id. § 10-3(a)), intimidation (id. § 12-6(a)(1)), two counts of
unlawful use of a weapon by a felon (UUWF) (id. § 24-1.1(a)), domestic battery (id. § 12-
3.2(a)(2)), and resisting a peace officer (id. § 31-1(a)). The case proceeded to a bench trial.
¶5 Relevant to this appeal, Jamie Hollingsworth testified that she and the defendant were in a
romantic relationship and had a child together. Hollingsworth had five other children from prior
relationships. Hollingsworth testified that she lived with the defendant and her six children at the
time of the incident. In February 2018, Hollingsworth was hospitalized with a head injury that she
sustained by hitting her head in her bedroom. She did not recall how she hit her head. She suffered
from memory loss after the incident and only told officers that the defendant had injured her
because that is what she had been told at the hospital. Hollingsworth testified that she did not
believe the defendant caused her injuries.
¶6 Hollingsworth’s children testified that they had, on prior occasions, heard her and the
defendant fighting in their bedroom. Hollingsworth would leave the bedroom infrequently and
when the children saw her, they observed bruising and cuts to her face. Hollingsworth
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}