People v. Perkins
── People v. Perkins ──
Court: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date: May 15, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE
2026 IL App (5th) 230251-U
NOTICE
Decision filed 05/15/26. The
This order was filed under
text of this decision may be NOS. 5-23-0251, 5-23-0252 cons. Supreme Court Rule 23 and is
changed or corrected prior to
the filing of a Petition for not precedent except in the
Rehearing or the disposition of
IN THE limited circumstances allowed
the same. under Rule 23(e)(1).
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
FIFTH DISTRICT
______________________________________________________________________________
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the
) Circuit Court of
Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Montgomery County.
)
v. ) Nos. 14-CF-110, 14-CF-122
)
LLOYD RAY PERKINS, ) Honorable
) James L. Roberts,
Defendant-Appellant. ) Judge, presiding.
______________________________________________________________________________
JUSTICE CLARKE * delivered the judgment of the court.
Justices Boie and Sholar concurred in the judgment.
ORDER
¶1 Held: Where (1) the evidence at trial was sufficient to support defendant’s conviction;
(2) the defendant failed to preserve evidentiary objections at trial, and failed to
prove plain error; (3) the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it allowed
statements of a co-conspirator into evidence; (4) defendant stipulated to certain
evidentiary admissions; (5) the court did not abuse its discretion when it allowed
the impeachment by prior inconsistent statement of a witness during redirect
examination; and (6) defendant’s Krankel counsel on remand was not ineffective,
we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.
¶2 Defendant Lloyd Ray Perkins was charged with armed robbery, unlawful use of a weapon
by a felon, and aggravated discharge of a firearm in Montgomery County circuit court case No.
2014-CF-110. Defendant was also charged with obstruction of justice in Montgomery County
*Justice Moore was originally assigned to the panel before his retirement. Justice Clarke was
substituted on the panel and has listened to oral arguments and read the briefs.
1
circuit court case No. 2014-CF-122. Defendant was convicted in the obstruction case on April 8,
2015, and filed his notice of appeal in the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, case No. 5-15-
0393 on September 3, 2015. Defendant was convicted in his other case of armed robbery and
unlawful use of a weapon by a felon on March 17, 2016, and he filed his notice of appeal in Illinois
Appellate Court, Fifth District, case No. 5-16-0182 on April 27, 2016.
¶3 On November 26, 2018, this court entered judgments in both cases, remanding the
obstruction of justice case for Krankel proceedings, and the armed robbery case for reconsideration
of the trial court’s denial of trial counsel’s motion to withdraw, based on the court’s findings in
the Krankel proceedings. On March 23, 2023, the trial court entered an order regarding the matters
on appellate remand, denying the defendan
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}