In re Marriage of Rios
── In re Marriage of Rios ──
Court: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date: May 15, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and is not precedent except
in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
2026 IL App (3d) 230122-U
Order filed May 15, 2026
____________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
THIRD DISTRICT
2023
In re MARRIAGE OF ) Appeal from the Circuit Court
) of the 13th Judicial Circuit,
JUANITA RIOS, ) LaSalle County, Illinois,
)
Petitioner-Appellant, )
) Appeal No. 3-23-0122
and ) Circuit No. 18-D-185
)
JESUS RIOS, ) Honorable
) Michelle A. Vescogni,
Respondent-Appellee. ) Judge, Presiding.
____________________________________________________________________________
JUSTICE HOLDRIDGE delivered the judgment of the court.
Justices Brennan and Davenport concurred in the judgment.
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
¶1 Held: Trial court did not err in classifying respondent’s bank account as non-marital
property, in denying the petitioner’s dissipation claim, or in denying petitioner’s
claim for maintenance.
¶2 Petitioner, Juanita Rios, appeals from a judgment of dissolution of marriage to
Respondent, Jesus Rios, arguing the trial court erred in (1) finding Jesus’s bank account to be
non-marital property and awarding the funds in that account to Jesus, (2) denying Juanita’s
dissipation claim, and (3) failing to award Juanita maintenance. We affirm.
¶3 I. BACKGROUND
¶4 Jesus Rios and Juanita Rios married in 1972 and divorced in 1991. They remarried on
September 27, 2010, and Juanita filed a second petition for dissolution of marriage on June 12,
2018. No children were born of the second marriage, but the parties had four children from their
first marriage. In the first divorce, Jesus received his railroad pension (as it then existed) and the
house at 1876 N. Hennepin Street, LaSalle, while Juanita received a spouse’s share of the
railroad pension (as it then existed) and the house at 2423 Rock Street, Peru.
¶5 Jesus worked for the railroad and retired in October of 2011, approximately 13 months
after he remarried Juanita. Jesus’ name was placed on the deed of the house in Peru, where they
lived during their second marriage. Jesus paid off Juanita’s existing mortgage of approximately
$41,000. In September of 2017, Juanita had Jesus removed from their residence through an order
of protection. The parties were each 70 years old at the time the second judgment of dissolution
of marriage was entered.
¶6 Jesus had a checking account with First Federal Savings Bank (FFSB). This was his only
individual checking account, and his railroad pension was deposited into that account. The
checking account existed prior to Jesus’ remarriage to Juanita, and Jesus testified at trial that the
only funds going into the account were from his railroad pension. The FFSB account was in
Jesus’s name only and no other person has ever been on the account. Jesus also testif
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}