Philips North America v. Image Tech Conslt
── Philips North America v. Image Tech Conslt ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: May 15, 2026
Category: Private Civil Federal
Case: 25-10549 Document: 91-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/15/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
____________ FILED
May 15, 2026
No. 25-10549
____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Philips North America, L.L.C.,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Image Technology Consulting, L.L.C.; Marshall R.
Shannon; Image Technology Consulting II, L.L.C.;
Axiom Imaging Solutions, Incorporated,
Defendants—Appellants.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:22-CV-147
______________________________
Before Elrod, Chief Judge, and Willett and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
Having carefully considered the briefing, the record, and the oral
arguments of counsel, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in granting Philips’s motion for spoliation sanctions and awarding
damages. We AFFIRM substantially for the reasons stated in the district
court’s thorough November 4, 2024 Memorandum Opinion and Order. We
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-10549 Document: 91-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/15/2026
No. 25-10549
also AFFIRM the dismissal of the counterclaims brought by Image
Technology Consulting, LLC and Shannon.
2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}