Peo in Interest of Herrera
── Peo in Interest of Herrera ──
Court: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date: May 14, 2026
Category: General
26CA0414 Peo in Interest of Herrera 05-14-2026
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Appeals No. 26CA0414
Jefferson County District Court No. 23MH474
Honorable Jessica Walker, Magistrate
The People of the State of Colorado,
Petitioner-Appellee,
In the Interest of Jose Herrera,
Respondent-Appellant.
ORDER AFFIRMED
Division A
Opinion by JUDGE HAWTHORNE*
Román, C.J., and Martinez*, J., concur
NOT PUBLISHED PURSUANT TO C.A.R. 35(e)
Announced May 14, 2026
Kimberly Sorrells, County Attorney, Sarah Oviatt, Senior Assistant County
Attorney, Golden, Colorado, for Petitioner-Appellee
Tezak Law, P.C., Mary Tezak, Florence, Colorado, for Respondent-Appellant
*Sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice under provisions of Colo. Const. art.
VI, § 5(3), and § 24-51-1105, C.R.S. 2025.
¶1 Jose Herrera appeals the district court magistrate’s order
extending his long-term certification for care and treatment under
section 27-65-110, C.R.S. 2025. We affirm.
I. Background
¶2 In March 2023, Herrera was admitted to a mental health
hospital for competency restoration. His associated criminal
charges were dismissed five months later, at which time the
hospital placed Herrera on an emergency mental health hold. The
People subsequently filed a series of successful petitions for
short-term and long-term certifications for treatment, asserting that
Herrera was gravely disabled due to his schizoaffective disorder and
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). See § 27-65-109, C.R.S.
2025 (describing the conditions and procedures for short-term
certification); see also § 27-65-110(5) (permitting “as many
[long-term certification] extensions as the court orders”). As a
result, Herrera has been continuously hospitalized since 2023 and
now resides at Colorado Mental Health Hospital in Fort Logan
(CMHH-FL).
¶3 In January 2026, the People once again petitioned for a
six-month extension of Herrera’s long-term certification, alleging
1
that his diagnosis remains consistent and that he continues to
require structure and support for daily functioning. Herrera
requested an evidentiary hearing to address the petition.
¶4 At the hearing, Dr. Michelle Selsenmeyer testified that
Herrera’s primary diagnosis is schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type,
and his secondary diagnoses are PTSD and stimulant use disorders.
She further testified that Herrera is gravely disabled as a result of
his schizoaffective disorder, which “impacts his ability to
independently . . . manage his basic needs,” especially his eating
and drinking behaviors, hygiene, and medication management.
Hence, Herrera was at risk of substantial bodily harm.
¶5 As to eating and drinking behaviors, Dr. Selsenmeyer testified
that Herrera often stared at his food, then ate very slowly or threw
his food away. He also grabbed food out of the garbage or from
other patients. Herrera had lost weight since being admitted to
CMHH-FL, and staff were monitoring his weight and eating
behaviors to ensure his safe nutrition. He also had a history of
drinking toxic amounts of water and required intermittent fluid
restrictions. As to hygiene issues, Dr. Selsenmeyer testified that
Herrera had been using his toothbrush to clean doorknobs with
2
hand sanitizer, then brushing his teeth with that toothbrush.
Herrera also needed step-by-step direction to clean himself in the
shower and significant prompting to launder his clothes. Finally, as
to medication management, Dr. Selsenmeyer testified that Herrera
currently required “med sits” (fifteen-minute supervision after
“taking in his meds”) to ensure that he was not diverting the
prescribed medications.
¶6 Herrera also
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}