United States v. Perez
── United States v. Perez ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date: May 13, 2026
Category: General
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 13 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1265
D.C. No.
Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cr-00508-CAB-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JAIME PEREZ, AKA Beef,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2026**
Before: LEE, DESAI, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Jaime Perez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
bench-trial conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Perez asserts that § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment, both facially
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
and as applied to him as a purportedly non-violent felon. As he concedes, this
claim is foreclosed. See United States v. Duarte, 137 F.4th 743, 750 (9th Cir. 2025)
(en banc) (“[Section] 922(g)(1) is constitutional as applied to non-violent
felons[.]”), cert. denied, __ S. Ct. __, 2026 WL 135692 (U.S. Jan. 20, 2026).
AFFIRMED.
2 23-1265
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}