United States v. Clint Registe
── United States v. Clint Registe ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date: May 14, 2026
Category: General
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 14 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30042
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.
3:18-cr-00140-TMB-MMS-1
v.
CLINT REGISTE, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Alaska
Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2026**
Before: LEE, DESAI, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Clint Registe appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for being a felon in possession of
firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The request for oral
argument is denied.
Registe first contends that the district court erred under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c)
by declining to run his federal sentence concurrent to his then prospective state
sentence. However, the court did not abuse its “broad discretion” by determining
that a consecutive, statutory maximum sentence was warranted under the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) factors, including the need to protect the public and Registe’s substantial
criminal history involving violence and firearms. See United States v. Shouse, 755
F.3d 1104, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2014).
Registe next contends that § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment. This
claim is foreclosed. See United States v. Duarte, 137 F.4th 743, 761 (9th Cir. 2025)
(en banc) (rejecting constitutional challenge to § 922(g)(1)’s categorical
disarmament of felons), cert. denied, __ S. Ct. __, 2026 WL 135692 (U.S. Jan. 20,
2026).
AFFIRMED.
2 20-30042
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}