Alexandre Ansari v. Moises Jimenez
── Alexandre Ansari v. Moises Jimenez ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date: May 14, 2026
Category: General
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)
File Name: 26a0148p.06
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
┐
ALEXANDRE ANSARI,
│
Plaintiff-Appellee, │
> No. 24-1743
│
v. │
│
MOISES JIMENEZ, │
Defendant-Appellant. │
┘
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
No. 2:20-cv-10719—Stephen Joseph Murphy III, District Judge.
Argued: December 10, 2025
Decided and Filed: May 14, 2026
Before: BATCHELDER, GILMAN, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges.
_________________
COUNSEL
ARGUED: Mary Massaron, PLUNKETT COONEY, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, for
Appellant. Beth A. Wittmann, GRANZOTTO & WITTMANN, P.C., Berkley, Michigan, for
Appellee. ON BRIEF: Mary Massaron, PLUNKETT COONEY, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan,
for Appellant. Beth A. Wittmann, GRANZOTTO & WITTMANN, P.C., Berkley, Michigan, for
Appellee.
_________________
OPINION
_________________
LARSEN, Circuit Judge. Alexandre Ansari was convicted in Michigan state court of
first-degree murder and two counts of assault with intent to commit murder. He was sentenced
to life in prison without the possibility of parole. But a review conducted by the local
prosecutor’s office later concluded that Ansari was not guilty of the crimes. In response, the
No. 24-1743 Ansari v. Jimenez Page 2
state court vacated Ansari’s convictions and sentence pursuant to a stipulated order. Ansari then
filed this federal action against Moises Jimenez, the detective who investigated the crimes.
Ansari alleged that Jimenez failed to disclose material exculpatory evidence in violation of
Ansari’s constitutional rights. A jury found for Ansari and awarded him $10 million in damages.
Jimenez now appeals. We AFFIRM.
I.
The events that led to Ansari’s conviction began on September 22, 2012, when Rosalind
Barley and her younger sister, Ileana Cuevas, drove to Miguel Figueroa’s home in Detroit,
Michigan. People v. Ansari, 2015 WL 630388, at *1 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 2015). Barley
testified at Ansari’s criminal trial that when they arrived, Figueroa, who was Barley’s boyfriend,
got in the back seat of the car. Barley then “heard a series of loud noises that sounded like
fireworks.” Id. Barley testified “that she did not immediately realize the noises were gunshots
hitting her vehicle; however, after looking out the passenger window, she saw [Ansari] across the
street holding a long gun.” Id. Figueroa also testified that he saw Ansari fire a weapon toward
the vehicle. Id. Figueroa quickly got out of the car and Barley drove away. Id. Barley then
realized that Cuevas had been shot. Id. Figueroa tried to flee but was shot twice as he was
running away. Id. Figueroa “testified that after being shot, he turned around in order ‘to get a
good look at [the shooter] again,’ and was then shot in the face.” Id. (alteration in original). He
nonetheless survived.
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}