Igarashi v. Holma
── Igarashi v. Holma ──
Court: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date: May 13, 2026
Category: General
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
13-MAY-2026
09:31 AM
Dkt. 11 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
________________________________________________________________
MICHELLE IGARASHI and CLYDE IGARASHI, Petitioners,
vs.
THE HONORABLE KARIN L. HOLMA,
Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit,
State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,
and
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR HARBORVIEW
MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-14, Respondent.
________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC171000618)
ORDER DENYING PETITION AND MOTION FOR STAY
(By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ.,
and Circuit Judge Tomasa, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of the petition for writs of mandamus
and prohibition filed December 11, 2025, the motion for stay
filed December 11, 2025, and the record, Petitioners have not
demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief. See
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537
P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
Nor have Petitioners shown that a stay is warranted. See
Stop Rail Now v. DeCosta, 120 Hawaiʻi 238, 243, 203 P.3d 658, 663
(App. 2008).
It is ordered that the petition and motion for stay are
denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 13, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Taryn R. Tomasa
2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}