Ron Johnson D/B/A Ron Johnson & Sons, Inc. v. Kris L. Spangler; Tina Marie Spangler; And McGowan Built Properties, LLC
── Ron Johnson D/B/A Ron Johnson & Sons, Inc. v. Kris L. Spangler; Tina Marie Spangler; And McGowan Built Properties, LLC ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: May 13, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 301
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION III
No. CV-25-279
RON JOHNSON D/B/A RON Opinion Delivered May 13, 2026
JOHNSON & SONS, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE BENTON
APPELLANT
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 04CV-24-1947]
V.
HONORABLE CHRISTINE
KRIS L. SPANGLER; TINA MARIE HORWART, JUDGE
SPANGLER; AND MCGOWAN BUILT
PROPERTIES, LLC
REVERSED AND REMANDED IN
APPELLEES
PART; AFFIRMED IN PART;
REVERSED IN PART
STEPHANIE POTTER BARRETT, Judge
Ron Johnson d/b/a Ron Johnson & Sons, Inc. (“Johnson”), appeals the Benton
County Circuit Court’s December 2, 2024 order dismissing his complaint with prejudice
and discharging his lien as well as the January 28, 2025 order denying his motion for
reconsideration and granting the motions for attorney’s fees filed by the appellees, Kris L.
Spangler and Tina Marie Spangler (“Spangler”) and McGowan Built Properties, LLC
(“McGowan”). We reverse and remand the dismissal of the breach-of-contract claim, affirm
discharge of the lien, and reverse the award of attorney’s fees.
Spangler owns property located at 11261 Stillhouse Springs Drive, Bentonville,
Benton County, Arkansas. In 2023, Dakota Riggan, a McGowan employee, contacted
Johnson via text message to request a quote to construct a Romanstone block wall at the
property as part of the construction of a residence for Spangler.
Johnson claims that on March 27, 2023, he contracted with McGowan to construct
the wall for $5,600. Johnson completed the construction of the wall on or before March 29,
2023. After completion, Spangler and McGowan asserted that the wall was constructed
improperly and refused to pay Johnson.
On April 3, 2023, Johnson sent Spangler a letter with an invoice for the construction
of the wall. The correspondence and accompanying invoice identified the business as
“Johnson & Son’s Constr.” On April 10, 2023, Spangler responded by letter, acknowledging
the agreement to pay $5,600 as reflected in the invoice but asserted, again, that the wall was
constructed improperly.
On June 12, 2023, Johnson’s counsel, on behalf of Ron Johnson and “Johnson &
Son’s Construction,” sent Spangler and McGowan a pre-lien notice demanding payment of
the invoice and informing them that a lien would be filed against the property if payment
was not made within ten days of receipt of the notice. Neither McGowan nor Spangler paid
the invoice within ten days after the delivery of the notice.
On July 21, 2023, Johnson filed a mechanics’ and/or materialmen’s lien statement
of lien account and affidavit of notice against Spangler and the property with the Benton
County Circuit Clerk. The claimant on the lien was named as “Mr. Ron Johnson d/b/a Ron
Johnson & Sons, Inc.” This is the first instance in which the name “Ron Johnson & Sons,
Inc.” appeared in connection with the transaction.
2
On June 26, 2024, Johnson, under Ron Johnson d/b/a Ron Johnson & Sons, Inc.,
filed a complaint in foreclosure alleging compliance with all of the statutory requirements to
enforce a lien and seeking damages in the amount of $5,600 along with attorney’s fees and
costs. Johnson also alleged a breach of contract, asserting that there was a material breach of
the parties’ agreement when the invoice was not paid, and he again asserted that he had
suffered damages in the amount of $5,600 and had incurred attorney’s fees and costs.
On July 8, 2024, Spangler filed an answer and counterclaim allegi
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}