State v. Gordillo
── State v. Gordillo ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arizona
Date: May 13, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee,
v.
NOEL JESUS GORDILLO, Appellant.
No. 1 CA-CR 25-0115
FILED 05-13-2026
Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
No. CR2023-111151-001
The Honorable Geoffrey H. Fish, Judge
AFFIRMED
COUNSEL
Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix
By Michael T. O'Toole
Counsel for Appellee
Bain & Lauritano, P.L.C., Glendale
By Amy E. Bain
Counsel for Appellant
STATE v. GORDILLO
Decision of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Judge James B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court, in which
Presiding Judge Andrew M. Jacobs and Judge Brian Y. Furuya joined.
M O R S E, Judge:
¶1 Noel Jesus Gordillo ("Gordillo") appeals his conviction for
second-degree murder. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1
¶2 On March 5, 2023, at around 8:00 p.m., "John"2 rode his bike
near 28th Drive and West Cactus Road and stopped to speak with Gordillo's
sister. During the conversation, Gordillo approached the pair, took John's
bike, and rode off. John felt nervous and left to find his friend ("Michael")
to warn him that he might be in danger. John found Michael and tried to
get his attention. But Gordillo then rode the stolen bicycle to Michael,
pointed a gun, yelled "hey, Michael," and shot him.
¶3 Michael ran across the street into a restaurant. He bled from
his mouth and collapsed onto a table and then the floor. He then stood up
and left the restaurant, leaving a backpack on the floor, and ran across the
street, leaving a trail of blood. Michael entered a convenience store holding
his bloody jaw and collapsed. Michael later died from the gunshot wound
to his head.
¶4 John followed Michael to the restaurant and grabbed the
backpack. John then followed Michael to the convenience store, but the
employees had locked the doors and did not allow John to enter. John later
retrieved Michael's scooter from near where he had been shot and returned
the scooter and backpack to Michael's girlfriend. The next day, John
retrieved his stolen bicycle from Gordillo's sister and had his friend call
"Silent Witness"—an anonymous tip line—to report the shooting.
1 We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the
verdict and resolve all reasonable inferences against Gordillo. See State v.
Stroud, 209 Ariz. 410, 412, ¶ 6 (2005).
2 We use pseudonyms to protect the privacy of victims and witnesses.
2
STATE v. GORDILLO
Decision of the Court
¶5 Eventually, on March 14, 2023, John chose to speak with the
police because he felt he "had to do what's right." John identified Gordillo
from a photographic lineup, and, on March 15, 2023, Gordillo was arrested.
¶6 The State charged Gordillo with second-degree murder and,
after a fifteen-day trial, a jury convicted him. The trial court sentenced
Gordillo to 20 years in prison. Gordillo timely appealed and we have
jurisdiction under A.R.S. §§ 12-120.21(A)(1), 13-4031, and -4033(A)(1).
DISCUSSION
¶7 On appeal, Gordillo challenges the denial of his motion for
new trial. Gordillo also contends the court erred by allowing a detective to
testify as an expert withou
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}