Shamiryan v. City of Glendale CA2/7
── Shamiryan v. City of Glendale CA2/7 ──
Court: California Court of Appeal
Date: May 12, 2026
Category: General
Filed 5/12/26 Shamiryan v. City of Glendale CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
NORA SHAMIRYAN, B340724
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No.
v. 23GDCV00069)
CITY OF GLENDALE,
Defendant and
Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of
Los Angeles County, Ashfaq G. Chowdhury, Judge. Affirmed.
Beloryan & Manukyan, Haik Beloryan and Vahe
Shakhgeldyan for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney, Ann M. Maurer, Chief
Assistant City Attorney, and Carl B. Arias, Principal Assistant
City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.
_______________________________
Nora Shamiryan tripped and fell due to a sidewalk fault
that measured 1.5 inches or less. She sued the City of Glendale.
Glendale moved for summary judgment. The trial court found
there was no triable issue of material fact on the lack of notice
and the fault was trivial as a matter of law. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. The Underlying Incident and the Complaint
Nora Shamiryan has lived in her Glendale neighborhood
since approximately 2002 and was familiar with the area.
Shamiryan “would walk around 20 minutes to 30 minutes every
day,” taking varying routes. On the afternoon of May 24, 2022,
Shamiryan left her home to go for a walk. It was a sunny and
clear day, and she was “looking straight ahead just in a normal
fashion.” About 2:30 p.m. or 3:00 p.m., Shamiryan’s left foot
struck a raised portion of the sidewalk near 600 South Street.
This caused her to trip and fall forward onto the ground.
Shamiryan testified during a deposition that there were “dry
leaves” and “dry branches fallen, scattered around.” During the
same deposition, Shamiryan testified that there was nothing
obstructing her view of the raised sidewalk at the time of the
accident and there were no shadows covering the raised sidewalk.
In January 2023 Shamiryan filed a complaint alleging
negligence and premises liability under Government Code
sections 815, subdivision (a), 815.2, and 835 et seq.
B. Glendale’s Motion for Summary Judgment
After answering the complaint, Glendale moved for
summary judgment on the grounds that (1) the offset was too
2
trivial to constitute a dangerous condition and (2) Glendale had
no notice of the dangerous condition. In support of its motion,
Glendale submitted the declarations of Jesus Valencia, a cement
worker finisher, and Matthew Binder, a street crew supervisor,
both of whom work for Glendale’s Public Works Maintenance
Services Section, which is responsible for maintaining and
repairing Glendale streets and sidewalks. Binder oversees the
concrete operations department, in which Valencia works, and
both assist in investigating claims for damages presented to
Glendale.
Valencia stated that in November 2022 he visited the
sidewalk location where Shamiryan fell. He “identified the offset
in that area” and noted that it “did not have any jagged edges or
broken pieces.” Valencia measured “the offset at its highest
point,” which he recorded as “1 and 1/8 (1.125) of an inch,” and
took photographs. That same day, Glendale employees “applied a
patch of asphalt to the offset sidewalk to make it sloped.”
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}