Ibrahim Alzandani v. Hamtramck Pub. Schs.
── Ibrahim Alzandani v. Hamtramck Pub. Schs. ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date: May 12, 2026
Category: General
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)
File Name: 26a0142p.06
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
┐
IBRAHIM ALZANDANI,
│
Plaintiff, │
│
Y.A., a minor by Next Friend Ibrahim Alzandani; │
W.A., a minor by Next Friend Nadhem Alnajar; A.M., │
a minor by Next Friend Abraham Muzib, > Nos. 25-1601/1602/1603
│
Plaintiffs-Appellees, │
│
v. │
│
│
HAMTRAMCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS (25-1603); MICHIGAN │
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (25-1602); WAYNE │
COUNTY REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AGENCY │
(25-1601), │
Defendants-Appellants. │
┘
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
No. 2:23-cv-12817—Brandy R. McMillion, District Judge.
Argued: March 3, 2026
Decided and Filed: May 12, 2026
Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER and RITZ, Circuit Judges.
_________________
COUNSEL
ARGUED: Stephen J. van Stempvoort, MILLER JOHNSON, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant
Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency. Kathleen A. Halloran, MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellant Michigan
Department of Education. Robert A. Dietzel, THRUN LAW FIRM, P.C., East Lansing,
Michigan, for Appellant Hamtramck Public Schools. Tarik D. Turfe, HAMMOUD,
DAKHLALLAH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Dearborn, Michigan, for Appellees. ON BRIEF:
Stephen J. van Stempvoort, Kevin T. Sutton, Brandon S. Corcoran, MILLER JOHNSON,
Detroit, Michigan, for Appellant Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency.
Nos. 25-1601/1602/1603 Alzandani et al. v. Hamtramck Pub. Schs. et al. Page 2
Kathleen A. Halloran, Ticara D. Hendley, Neil A. Giovanatti, Marissa Wiesen, MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellant Michigan
Department of Education. Robert A. Dietzel, Kelly S. Bowman, THRUN LAW FIRM, P.C.,
East Lansing, Michigan, for Appellant Hamtramck Public Schools. Tarik D. Turfe, Kassem M.
Dakhlallah, HAMMOUD, DAKHLALLAH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Dearborn, Michigan, for
Appellees. Selene Almazan-Altobelli, COUNCIL OF PARENT ATTORNEYS AND
ADVOCATES, INC., Towson, Maryland, for Amici Curiae.
SUTTON, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court in which BATCHELDER, J.,
concurred and RITZ, J., concurred in the judgment. RITZ, J. (pp. 18–21), delivered a separate
concurring opinion.
_________________
OPINION
_________________
SUTTON, Chief Judge. A group of Michigan parents alleges that a local public school
district denied their children access to special-education services. The parents, as a result, filed
this lawsuit under several federal laws, including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
what’s come to be called the IDEA for short. The IDEA estab
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}