State of Iowa v. Monte Dean Neubauer
── State of Iowa v. Monte Dean Neubauer ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Iowa
Date: April 29, 2026
Category: General
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
_______________
No. 25-0586
Filed April 29, 2026
_______________
State of Iowa,
Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
Monte Dean Neubauer,
Defendant–Appellant.
_______________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County,
The Honorable Karen Kaufman Salic, Judge.
_______________
AFFIRMED
_______________
Nathan A. Olson of Branstad & Olson Law Office, Des Moines, attorney for
appellant.
Brenna Bird, Attorney General, and Olivia D. Brooks, Assistant Attorney
General, attorneys for appellee.
_______________
Considered without oral argument
by Tabor, C.J., and Chicchelly and Sandy, JJ.
Opinion by Sandy, J.
1
SANDY, Judge.
This appeal turns less on what the district court denied than on what
the defendant declined. Despite receiving a continuance, advance notice of
the rescheduled hearing, and additional opportunities to confer with counsel
and present mitigating evidence, Monte Neubauer proceeded to sentencing
and now challenges both the process and the result. Finding no abuse of
discretion in either the denial of a further continuance or the imposition of
consecutive sentences, we affirm.
BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Neubauer was charged in two separate Cerro Gordo County matters
arising from events occurring in November 2024. The State charged
Neubauer with eluding and driving while barred following an incident on
November 15. Law enforcement attempted to stop Neubauer while he was
operating a motor vehicle with a barred license. Neubauer did not
immediately stop but continued driving to his residence while generally
complying with traffic laws.
Less than two weeks later, on November 26, officers encountered
Neubauer in connection with outstanding probation-violation warrants.
During that encounter, a search of his person yielded a small quantity of
methamphetamine, leading to a charge of possession of a controlled
substance, third offense.
On February 4, 2025, Neubauer entered guilty pleas to possession of a
controlled substance, third offense, and eluding. As part of the resolution,
the State dismissed the driving-while-barred count in the earlier case. The
district court accepted his pleas and scheduled sentencing for March 4.
2
Before sentencing, Neubauer moved to withdraw his guilty pleas and
stipulations related to probation violations. The district court set the matter
for hearing and, upon request, granted a continuance to allow additional
preparation following the filing of the presentence investigation report. The
hearing was scheduled for March 10.
At the hearing, Neubauer withdrew his motion to withdraw his pleas
but requested an additional continuance, citing limited preparation time,
recent schedule changes, and the unavailability of witnesses he intended to
present at sentencing. The State resisted further delay, noting the matter had
been pending and that the defense had prior opportunity to prepare.
The district court initially considered a brief continuance but also
addressed concerns raised by Neubauer regarding counsel and preparation.
After a colloquy with the parties and opportunities to confer further with
counsel, the court proceeded with sentencing. At sentencing, the State
requested consecutive sentences and revocation of probation, including
terms of incarceration for the underlying offenses. Neubauer requested more
lenient dispositions
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}