Musa v. Shaltoni
── Musa v. Shaltoni ──
Court: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date: May 08, 2026
Category: General
2026 IL App (1st) 251946-U
SIXTH DIVISION
May 8, 2026
No. 1-25-1946
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and is not precedent except in the
limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
______________________________________________________________________________
IN THE
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
FIRST DISTRICT
______________________________________________________________________________
RIMA MUSA, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court
) of Cook County.
Petitioner-Appellee, )
)
)
v. ) No. 20 D 929
)
MOHAMMED SHALTONI, ) Honorable
) Andrea M. Webber,
Respondent-Appellant. ) Judge, presiding.
PRESIDING JUSTICE C.A. WALKER delivered the judgment of the court.
Justices Pucinski and Gamrath concurred in the judgment.
ORDER
¶1 Held: We affirm the circuit court’s modification of a parenting plan to adjust a travel bond
and increase electronic communication between appellant and his children.
¶2 This case arises from a modification of the parenting plan between appellant Mohammed
Shaltoni and appellee Rima Musa involving their three minor children. Through a series of motions
No. 1-25-1946
in early summer 2025, Shaltoni sought to amend the plan to increase the travel bond Musa had to
pay to travel with the children to Jordan, require Musa to drop a case she had pending against
Shaltoni in Jordan, and to facilitate greater electronic communication between Shaltoni and the
children. Across two orders, the circuit court agreed to increase the bond, but only from $2500 to
$3500 and not until 2026, and granted Shaltoni increased communication, but not to an extent
satisfactory to Shaltoni. Shaltoni appeals, and we affirm.
¶3 BACKGROUND
¶4 Musa filed her “verified petition for legal separation” on January 31, 2020, wherein she
represented that she and Shaltoni were married in Jordan in 2008 and had three minor children,
ages nine, seven, and two. She cited irreconcilable differences as the reason for the separation.
¶5 On June 14, 2022, the circuit court entered a “Parenting Plan and Allocation of Parental
Responsibilities Judgment (the Plan),” pursuant to which Musa was “designated as the parent
having substantial parenting time.” The Plan prohibited relocating the children more than 25 miles
from Shaltoni’s residence in Orland Park, Illinois, without court approval or the written consent
of both Musa and Shaltoni. As to electronic communication, the Plan stated, “Musa may contact
the minor children on Saturdays at 1:00 pm when they are in the physical possession of Shaltoni.
Shaltoni may contact the minor children on Saturday’s at 11:00 a.m. when they are in the physical
possession of Musa. If a parent needs to adjust a time for the communication, that parent shall
contact the other parent by 9:00 p.m. on Friday.” The Plan also noted that the court would resolve
the issue of travel to Jordan, the couple’s home country, at a later date.
¶6 Following a trial, the circuit court en
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}