Caetano v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
── Caetano v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. ──
Court: Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Date: May 05, 2026
Category: General
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
05-MAY-2026
08:36 AM
Dkt. 55 MO
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
ALLISON CAETANO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee,
and DOE PERSONS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10;
DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; ROE "NON-PROFIT" CORPORATIONS 1-10;
DOE UNINCORPORATED ORGANIZATIONS 1-10; and
ROE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.)
Allison Caetano's cat was killed while in the custody
of Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (HA) in Los Angeles. She sued HA in
Hawai#i. The Circuit Court of the First Circuit granted HA's
motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens.1 Caetano
appeals from the Final Judgment for HA. She challenges the
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order granting HA's
motion to dismiss, and the Order Granting Defendant Hawaiian
Airlines, Inc.'s Motion for Attorneys' Fees.
We hold that the circuit court acted within its
discretion by dismissing Caetano's lawsuit based on forum non
conveniens, but acted outside its discretion by dismissing the
action with prejudice, and by not conditioning the dismissal on
HA's agreement to waive any statute of limitations defense
1
The Honorable Dean E. Ochiai presided.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
provided Caetano filed suit in California within a reasonable
time. We vacate the Final Judgment and the orders granting HA's
motion to dismiss and awarding attorney fees, and remand to the
circuit court with instructions.
I. BACKGROUND
Caetano booked an HA flight from Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX) to Honolulu. On April 8, 2022, she
checked in her cat, Nubis, to travel in the baggage compartment.
After Nubis was checked in, he escaped from his kennel and was
fatally hit by a bus on the LAX tarmac.
Caetano sued HA on November 2, 2022. Her complaint
alleged negligence, gross negligence, negligent infliction of
emotional distress, breach of contract, negligent supervision,
and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
On October 13, 2023, HA moved to dismiss based on forum
non conveniens. The motion was heard on November 14, 2023. The
record does not contain a transcript of the hearing because
Caetano failed to deposit the required fee.2 HA's motion was
granted; Caetano's complaint was dismissed with prejudice. The
Final Judgment was entered on August 13, 2024. HA timely moved
for an award of $55,315.65 in attorney fees. The circuit court
granted the motion in part, awarding $26,323.55 including Hawai#i
general excise tax.3 Caetano appeals.
II. POINTS OF ERROR
Caetano's opening brief states two points of error.
She contends the circuit court erred by (1) granting HA's motion
to dismiss, and (2) granting HA's motion for attorney fees.
III. STANDARDS OF REVIEW
We review an order granting a motion to dismiss based
on forum non conveniens for abuse of discretion. UFJ Bank Ltd.
v. Ieda, 109 Hawai#i 137, 142, 123 P.3d 1232, 1237 (2005).
2
See Hawai#i Rules of A
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}