Quillen v. Car City CA2/1

── Quillen v. Car City CA2/1 ── Court: California Court of Appeal Date: May 07, 2026 Category: General Filed 5/6/26 Quillen v. Car City CA2/1 After recall of remittitur NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE MICHAEL QUILLEN, B318046 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 17STLC03903) v. ORDER MODIFYING CAR CITY, INC., et al., OPINION AFTER RECALL OF REMITTITUR (CHANGE Defendants and Appellants. IN JUDGMENT) THE COURT: The opinion in the above-entitled matter filed on March 27, 2023 is modified as follows: 1. In the first sentence of the opinion, the phrase “Defendant and appellant Car City, Inc. (Car City) appeals” is replaced with “Defendants and appellants Car City, Inc. and Chase Bank Finance (collectively, Car City) appeal.”  2. On page 3, the entire first sentence under the heading “A. Complaint” is deleted, including footnote 2, and replaced with the following sentence and footnote 2: Quillen sued Car City in October 2017, alleging causes of action against Car City for fraud and violations of the CLRA and UCL.2 The text of footnote 2 referenced in this new sentence shall be as follows: The complaint also named as a defendant American Contractors Indemnity Company, which is not a party to this appeal, alleging a cause of action against it under Vehicle Code section 11711. 3. The text of footnote 5 is deleted and replaced with the following: The court awarded no relief against American Contractors Indemnity Company. 4. The disposition is deleted and replaced with the following: The judgment is reversed as to the CLRA and UCL causes of action, and to the extent it entitles Quillen to collect attorney fees and costs. In all other respects, we affirm. Appellants are awarded their costs on appeal. These modifications constitute a change in judgment. ____________________________________________________________ ROTHSCHILD, P. J. WEINGART, J. 2 Filed 3/27/23 Quillen v. Car City CA2/1 (unmodified opinion) NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE MICHAEL QUILLEN, B318046 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 17STLC03903) v. CAR CITY, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephen M. Moloney, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Arno H. Keshishian for Defendants and Appellants. Law Offices of Michael Geller and Michael S. Geller for Plaintiff and Respondent.  Defendant and app