(In the Matter of the Adoption of Minor Child) Jacob Little v. Jackson Grant Roberts
── (In the Matter of the Adoption of Minor Child) Jacob Little v. Jackson Grant Roberts ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: May 06, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 275
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II
No. CV-25-278
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION Opinion Delivered: May 6, 2026
OF MINOR CHILD
APPEAL FROM THE BOONE
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
JACOB LITTLE
[NO. 05PR-22-5]
APPELLANT
HONORABLE JOHNNIE A.
V.
COPELAND, JUDGE
JACKSON GRANT ROBERTS AFFIRMED
APPELLEE
RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge
Jacob Little (“Jacob”) appeals from the final decree of adoption granted in the Boone
County Circuit Court on October 22, 2024, in favor of appellee Jackson Grant Roberts
(“Jackson”). On appeal, Jacob argues that the circuit court erred in finding that (1) his
consent to the adoption was unnecessary; and (2) that the adoption was in the best interest
of the minor child (MC). We affirm.
I. Background
MC was born in October 2014 to Kaitlyn Roberts (“Kaitlyn”) and Jacob. Kaitlyn and
Jacob were later married in July 2015. After losing his job in the fall of 2017, Jacob confessed
to Kaitlyn that he had been using methamphetamine for several years and had stolen
multiple tools and other equipment that Kaitlyn found around the property. Following this
confession, Jacob’s erratic behavior escalated: he shot guns outside of Kaitlyn’s and MC’s
bedroom windows and sent Kaitlyn a picture of his gun with the text “my friends said to tell
you hi” with a middle-finger emoji.
Due to Jacob’s escalating behavior, Kaitlyn petitioned the circuit court for a divorce
and, separately, for an order of protection. In her petition for an order of protection, Kaitlyn
cited Jacob’s “meth usage, suicide threats, carrying multiple weapons, job loss, non-support,
stealing, erratic behavior, paranoia, use of tracking devices and cameras, and daily verbal
abuse and anger” as the reason for the order. Kaitlyn was initially granted a temporary order
of protection that allowed Jacob supervised visitation with MC.
From October 26, 2017, to September 25, 2020, Jacob was frequently incarcerated.
His incarceration was mainly due to two separate cases that resulted in his pleading guilty to
forty-eight mostly drug-related felonies. He had one significant period of release from
October 10, 2018, until July 20, 2019. Jacob does not contend that he sought visitation with
MC during his period of release. All parties agree that Jacob last saw MC in October 2017
at her third birthday party. Jacob has not provided financial support, nor has he
communicated with MC since then.
On December 18, 2017, the divorce decree was granted and included the following
language:
That [Kaitlyn] shall have primary physical custody of the minor child. Because
of [Jacob]’s incarceration, there shall be no visitation and no child support.
Either party may petition the Court for visitation or support once [Jacob] is no
longer in custody.
2
The court entered a final order of protection on February 6, 2018, with an expiration date
of January 16, 2023. The final order of protection included the following language: “[Kaitlyn]
is awarded custody of [MC] pursuant to the Decree of Divorce filed December 18, 2018.
[Jacob] shall have no visitation with [MC].”
In December 2018, Kaitlyn began dating Jackson Roberts, and they were married in
June 2021. Jackson testified that during this period, he saw MC as his child, he had
financially and emotionally provided for MC, and they had a close bond
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}