Charles Edward Harris, Jr. v. State of Arkansas
── Charles Edward Harris, Jr. v. State of Arkansas ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: May 06, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 273
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION I
No. CR-24-35
CHARLES EDWARD HARRIS, JR. Opinion Delivered: May 6, 2026
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, THIRD
V. DIVISION
[NO. 60CR-08-571]
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE HONORABLE CATHLEEN V.
COMPTON, JUDGE
AFFIRMED
N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Chief Judge
Appellant Charles Edward Harris, Jr., appeals from the denial of his pro se petition
to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-90-111
(Repl. 2016). On appeal, he argues that the circuit court erred in rejecting his challenge to
the legality of his sentences for first-degree battery and committing a terroristic act because
his convictions for both crimes violated the prohibition against double jeopardy. We affirm
the circuit court’s denial of Harris’s petition.
I. Background Facts and Procedural History
On April 21, 2009, a Pulaski County jury convicted Harris of committing a terroristic
act, a Class Y felony, and first-degree battery, a Class B felony. The crimes for which he was
convicted occurred on December 28, 2007, when Harris fired eight or nine gunshots into a
vehicle occupied by the victim, Leannell Robinson, and his friend. The gunshots shattered
Robinson’s back window, and Robinson, who was sitting in the driver’s seat, was struck
several times. One bullet went through his right arm. Another struck him in his right
shoulder and lodged in his chest. He was also grazed by bullets on his forehead and left
pinky finger. Following his convictions, the jury was instructed at sentencing that Harris
had previously been convicted of two felonies: possession of a controlled substance—second
offense and committing a terroristic act. Harris was sentenced as a habitual offender to
fifteen years’ imprisonment on each offense, with the sentences to run concurrently. He
filed a direct appeal in this court challenging only an evidentiary ruling. Harris v. State, 2010
Ark. App. 247, at 1. This court affirmed his convictions, and the appellate mandate issued
on March 30, 2010.
On January 19, 2023, Harris filed his “Petition to Correct a[n] Illegal Conviction and
Sentence” pursuant to section 16-90-111 in the Pulaski County Circuit Court. In that
petition, he asserted a double-jeopardy challenge to his 2009 terroristic-act and first-degree-
battery convictions and sentences. Specifically, he claimed that his convictions for both
committing a terroristic act and first-degree battery violated Arkansas Code Annotated
section 5-1-110(a)(1) (Supp. 2007), which addresses multiple-offense prosecutions. He
claimed that the first-degree battery for which he was convicted was a lesser-included offense
of committing a terroristic act and that it was impossible to commit a terroristic act without
also committing first-degree battery. He attached his April 2009 judgment and commitment
order to the petition. He further claimed that those convictions had additional adverse
2
consequences because, after he was convicted of those crimes in April 2009, he pleaded guilty
to robbery and theft of property on June 26, 2009, and that his first-degree-battery conviction
was used to enhance his subsequent theft and robbery convictions. He attached his
judgment and commitment order from the June 2009 robbery and theft convictions, which
shows that Harri
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}