In the Matter of the Estate of James Edwin Ibeling
── In the Matter of the Estate of James Edwin Ibeling ──
Court: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date: May 01, 2026
Category: General
In the Iowa Supreme Court
No. 24–1139
Submitted March 25, 2026—Filed May 1, 2026
In the matter of the Estate of James Edwin Ibeling.
Nancy Ibeling,
Appellant.
On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Katie Ranes, district
associate probate judge.
A surviving spouse seeks further review from a court of appeals decision
holding that assets transferred to a Panamanian private interest foundation
founded by her husband are not included in the elective share under Iowa Code
section 633.238(1)(d)(1). Decision of Court of Appeals and District Court
Judgment Affirmed.
McDonald, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Oxley,
McDermott, and May, JJ., joined. Mansfield, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in
which Christensen, C.J., and Waterman, J., joined.
Gary Dickey (argued) of Dickey, Campbell & Sahag Law Firm, PLC,
Des Moines, and Dallas J. Janssen of Janssen Law, PLC, Des Moines, for
appellant.
Matthew G. Sease (argued) of Sease & Wadding, Des Moines, for appellee.
2
McDonald, Justice.
The surviving spouse of a decedent may elect to claim a share of statutorily
“limited” property of the decedent against the decedent’s will, including one third
of the value of the decedent’s property held in a revocable trust. Iowa Code
section 633.238(1)(d)(1) (2021). The question presented in this appeal is whether
the statutory provision creating the right to take an elective share of such
property is applicable to property held by a distinct legal entity that is not a
revocable trust but shares some of the same characteristics as a revocable trust.
I.
In December 2013, James Ibeling contacted a lawyer in Panama, Carlos
Eduardo Varela Cardenal, in connection with a real estate development project.
James asked Cardenal to establish a private interest foundation (PIF) pursuant
to Panama’s Law No. 25 of June 12, 1995. The foundation was named the
Harris 6 Foundation. Harris 6 was registered with the Republic of Panama in
January 2014. James was both the founder of Harris 6 and the main beneficiary
during his lifetime.
In the event of James’s death, the PIF regulations directed that the
foundation assets be passed to the substitute beneficiaries in equal parts. The
regulations listed four substitute beneficiaries: a testamentary charitable
foundation named the James Ibeling Foundation; James’s longtime personal
assistant and bookkeeper, Lisa Mengwasser; James’s nephew; and a minor from
Arizona whom James considered a friend and who is also named as a beneficiary
in James’s will, Deyon Rashad Harris. According to the foundation charter, the
purpose of the PIF was to “cover the costs of education, training, equipment, aid,
as well as the general maintenance or other similar purposes of one or more
members of one or more families specified” and to “benefit other natural or legal
3
persons or institutions of any nature and take the necessary provisions for the
orderly succession of their assets.”
James did not transfer any assets into the PIF at the time of its creation,
and it remained unfunded for the next five years. In August 2019, James
reconnected with Cardenal because he wanted to transfer assets to the PIF.
James’s assistant communicated to Cardenal that “[t]he purpose of transferring
assets into the Foundation [was] because Jim [was] considering getting married
(without a prenup) and want[ed] to protect his assets.” James conveyed twelve
properties in Arizona to the PIF by warranty deeds. Under Panamanian law,
Harris 6 was the owner of the properties. The warranty deeds were recorded on
August 23. Three days later, on August 2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}