Jackson v. State
── Jackson v. State ──
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date: May 05, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court
Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the
opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any
prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and
official text of the opinion.
In the
Supreme Court of Georgia
No. S26A0444
Kenneth Jackson
v.
The State
On Appeal from the DeKalb County Superior Court
No. 16CR2267
Decided: May 5, 2026
WARREN, Presiding Justice.
Kenneth Jackson was convicted of malice murder and other
crimes in connection with the shooting death of nine-month-old
KenDarious Edwards, Jr., and the non-fatal shootings of Tracy
Smith, Tanyika Smith, and Teniqua Clark. 1 On appeal, Jackson
1 The shootings occurred on May 10, 2014. In May 2016, a DeKalb
County grand jury indicted Jackson alongside co-defendants Christopher Flor-
ence and Marco Watson, as well as Eunice English, who pleaded guilty to ag-
gravated assault and kidnapping prior to trial. Relevant here, Jackson was
charged with malice murder, felony murder predicated on aggravated assault,
four counts of aggravated assault (one for each victim of the shooting), and
three counts of violating the Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act (“Gang
Act”). Jackson, Florence, and Watson were tried together before a jury from
October 15 to 29, 2018, and Jackson was found guilty on all counts for which
he was charged. Jackson was sentenced to serve life in prison without the
possibility of parole for malice murder; 20 consecutive years for each of the
aggravated assault counts against Tracy, Tanyika, and Clark; and 15 consec-
utive years for two of the three Gang Act counts, for a total sentence of life
without parole plus 90 consecutive years. The felony murder count was va-
cated by operation of law; the aggravated assault count for Edwards merged
contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a di-
rected verdict of acquittal; the evidence presented was not suffi-
cient to sustain his convictions as a matter of constitutional due
process; his trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective as-
sistance in several respects; the trial court plainly erred in admit-
ting evidence from unrelated gang investigations; and the trial
court made an improper comment on the evidence and erred by
denying his motion for a mistrial. Because the trial court did not
err in denying the motion for a directed verdict of acquittal; the
evidence was sufficient as a matter of constitutional due process;
trial counsel was not deficient in any of the respects Jackson
claims here; the trial court did not plainly err in admitting evi-
dence from unrelated gang investigations; and the denial of Jack-
son’s motion for a mistrial was not preserved for appellate review,
each claim fails. We thus affirm.
1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, the
evidence presented at trial showed the following. In May 2014,
Tracy lived in DeKalb County with her daughters, Tanyika and
N.J.; Tanyika’s friend, Clark; and Tanyika’s son, Edwards. Oth-
ers would sometimes come to the house as well, including Tracy’s
son, Oslushla Smith, and Tanyika’s friends, Kayla Dixon an
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}