All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion May 09, 2026

Jackson v. State

── Jackson v. State ── Court: Supreme Court of Georgia Date: May 05, 2026 Category: General NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Court of Georgia No. S26A0444 Kenneth Jackson v. The State On Appeal from the DeKalb County Superior Court No. 16CR2267 Decided: May 5, 2026 WARREN, Presiding Justice. Kenneth Jackson was convicted of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of nine-month-old KenDarious Edwards, Jr., and the non-fatal shootings of Tracy Smith, Tanyika Smith, and Teniqua Clark. 1 On appeal, Jackson 1 The shootings occurred on May 10, 2014. In May 2016, a DeKalb County grand jury indicted Jackson alongside co-defendants Christopher Flor- ence and Marco Watson, as well as Eunice English, who pleaded guilty to ag- gravated assault and kidnapping prior to trial. Relevant here, Jackson was charged with malice murder, felony murder predicated on aggravated assault, four counts of aggravated assault (one for each victim of the shooting), and three counts of violating the Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act (“Gang Act”). Jackson, Florence, and Watson were tried together before a jury from October 15 to 29, 2018, and Jackson was found guilty on all counts for which he was charged. Jackson was sentenced to serve life in prison without the possibility of parole for malice murder; 20 consecutive years for each of the aggravated assault counts against Tracy, Tanyika, and Clark; and 15 consec- utive years for two of the three Gang Act counts, for a total sentence of life without parole plus 90 consecutive years. The felony murder count was va- cated by operation of law; the aggravated assault count for Edwards merged contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a di- rected verdict of acquittal; the evidence presented was not suffi- cient to sustain his convictions as a matter of constitutional due process; his trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective as- sistance in several respects; the trial court plainly erred in admit- ting evidence from unrelated gang investigations; and the trial court made an improper comment on the evidence and erred by denying his motion for a mistrial. Because the trial court did not err in denying the motion for a directed verdict of acquittal; the evidence was sufficient as a matter of constitutional due process; trial counsel was not deficient in any of the respects Jackson claims here; the trial court did not plainly err in admitting evi- dence from unrelated gang investigations; and the denial of Jack- son’s motion for a mistrial was not preserved for appellate review, each claim fails. We thus affirm. 1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, the evidence presented at trial showed the following. In May 2014, Tracy lived in DeKalb County with her daughters, Tanyika and N.J.; Tanyika’s friend, Clark; and Tanyika’s son, Edwards. Oth- ers would sometimes come to the house as well, including Tracy’s son, Oslushla Smith, and Tanyika’s friends, Kayla Dixon an
CourtListener · May 05, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}