Evelyn Kayode v. Todd Blanche
── Evelyn Kayode v. Todd Blanche ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date: May 05, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 25-5076 September Term, 2025
FILED ON: MAY 5, 2026
EVELYN KAYODE,
APPELLANT
v.
TODD BLANCHE,
APPELLEE
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia
(No. 1:22-cv-03802)
Before: SRINIVASAN, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARCIA, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral argument of the parties. The panel has accorded
the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See
D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). It is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order granting summary judgment
be AFFIRMED.
I.
Evelyn Kayode was a Special Agent in the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector
General (OIG) from December 2015 through November 2019. At OIG, Kayode worked on
contract- and grant-fraud investigations in the Fraud Detection Office (FDO). Initially, her
performance reviews were largely positive.
2
Kayode’s problems at the FDO began in 2016, when she alleges a coworker began
harassing her and treating her rudely because she is a black woman of Nigerian origin. Kayode
filed a discrimination complaint in May 2018, shortly after which she was reassigned to a new
first-line supervisor, Amber Howell. Kayode was also supervised by Howell’s direct supervisor,
Lewe Sessions. Soon after Kayode’s reassignment, Howell and Sessions began repeatedly raising
concerns that she was not making timely progress on her investigations. That feedback was
reflected in Kayode’s 2017 performance evaluation, which rated her performance as “successful”
overall but noted timeliness as an area in which Kayode should improve. J.A. 617–20. Howell
also identified problems with Kayode’s written work and eventually assigned her a writing coach.
On November 28, 2018, Kayode got into a verbal altercation with Howell over her performance
feedback, leading Howell to issue Kayode a letter of reprimand.
Kayode’s deteriorating relationship with her supervisors caused her to develop anxiety that
aggravated her hypertension and irritable bowel syndrome. Beginning in November 2018, Kayode
submitted three formal requests for reasonable accommodation for her condition. Her first request,
submitted on November 14, 2018, sought six weeks of telework. OIG approved that request. On
January 9, 2019, Kayode submitted a second accommodation request for an additional eight weeks
of telework and received a two-week extension of her prior accommodation while OIG reviewed
the request. A few days later, Sessions emailed Kayode to express frustration that Kayode had
missed deadlines for written reports and repeatedly failed to meet an established requirement
during her telework period that she provide daily check-in emails detailing the work she
completed.
After receiving Sessions’ email, Kayode emailed several OIG officials stating that she was
“unable to physically and mentally cope with work” and that she “would like to explore the
opportunity of being reassigned to another office effective immediately.” J.A. 376. Kayode’s
email caused OIG officials to refer her for a fitness-for-duty examination, including a
psychological assessment. While her fitness was being assessed, Kayode was temporarily detailed
to an administrative role in another branch in OIG’s Investigations Division.
In April 2019, a clinical forensic psychologist evaluating Kayode’s fitn
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}