State v. Tenaglia
── State v. Tenaglia ──
Court: Superior Court of Delaware
Date: April 30, 2026
Category: General
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STATE OF DELAWARE, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
) ID. No. 2407012475
)
)
JOSHUA J. TENAGLIA )
)
Defendant. )
Submitted: January 23, 2026
Decided: April 30, 2026
COMMISSIONER’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF
SHOULD BE DENIED
Joseph S. Grubb, Esquire and Barzilai K. Axelrod, Esquire, Deputy Attorneys
General, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for the
State.
Defendant Joshua J. Tenaglia, Howard R. Young Correctional Institute,
Wilmington, Delaware, pro se.
SALOMONE, Commissioner
This 30th day of April 2026, upon consideration of the pro se Motion for
Postconviction Relief filed by Defendant Joshua J. Tenaglia (“Defendant” or
“Tenaglia”);1 the Affidavit in Response to Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction
Relief filed by trial counsel (“Trial Counsel”);2 the Defendant’s Reply;3 and the
record in this matter, the following is my Report and Recommendation.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On July 5, 2024, Defendant entered a smoke shop in Newark, Delaware
where, according to witnesses and surveillance footage, he engaged in a verbal
confrontation with a fellow patron.4 Soon thereafter, Defendant left the store,
entered a grey Mazda sedan, and proceeded northbound on Salem Church Road.5
According to further witnesses and surveillance footage from the area, the vehicle
was seen entering the shoulder where it collided with a pedestrian who was wearing
similar clothes to the individual Tenaglia was seen arguing with in the smoke shop.6
The driver of the vehicle did not stop after the collision and continued northbound.7
1
Docket Item 29. For purposes of this Report and Recommendation, all docket item references
relate to Superior Court Criminal Docket, State v. Tenaglia, Case No. 2407012475 (hereinafter,
“D.I. ____”).
2
D.I. 35.
3
D.I. 36.
4
D.I. 35.
5
Id.
6
Id; see also D.I. 39, Sentencing Transcript, dated September 9, 2025, at 13 (hereinafter, “D.I. 39
at __”), where the State notes that the victim “was walking on the side of the road, had nothing to
do with whatever interaction occurred over at the smoke shop . . .” Id.
7
D.I. 35.
2
The victim was identified as Michael D’Aloise, who ultimately passed away as a
result of the injuries he sustained from being struck by the vehicle.8 An investigation
ensued which identified the vehicle as belonging to Tenaglia.9 The car was located
by officers on July 10, 2024, in Claymont, Delaware.10 Tenaglia was brought in by
police for an interview where he confirmed his involvement in the incident but
explained that he “didn’t mean to hit him…I was just trying to scare him.”11
On July 29, 2024, a Superior Court Grand Jury indicted Tenaglia for (i)
Murder First Degree, (ii) Possession of a Deadly Weapon During the Commission
of a Felony (“PDWDCF”), (iii) Leaving the Scene of a Collision Resulting in Death,
and (iv) Failure to Report a Collision Resulting in Injury or Death.12 The same day,
this Court issued a Rule 9 Warrant,13 and Defendant was subsequently arrested.
According to Trial Counsel’s Affidavit, he “met numerous times with Mr.
Tenaglia in person at the jail and over videophone,” during the pendency of the
action.14 Trial Counsel states that these meetings consisted of discussions of the
8
Id.
9
Id.
10
Id.
11
Id.
12
D.I. 1.
13
D.I. 3.
14
D.I. 35. Trial Counsel indicates that he met with
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}