United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anthony Wenzell
── United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anthony Wenzell ──
Court: Supreme Court of Colorado
Date: April 27, 2026
Category: General
1
2026 CO 25
United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioners v. Anthony Wenzell, Respondent
No. 24SC372
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc
April 27, 2026
Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Case No. 23CA1327.
2
Attorneys for Petitioner United Services Automobile
Association: Spencer Fane LLP Evan Stephenson Jeremy Moseley
Denver, Colorado.
Attorneys for Petitioner State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance Company: Lehotsky Keller Cohn LLP Katherine C.
Yarger Denver, Colorado Patterson Ripplinger, P.C. Franklin
D. Patterson Karl A. Chambers Greenwood Village, Colorado.
Attorneys for Respondent: Robert J. Anderson, P.C. Robert J.
Anderson Scott F. Anderson Timothy G. Buxton Colorado
Springs, Colorado Patrick Collins Esq. LLC L. Dan Rector
Colorado Springs, Colorado
3
Attorneys for Amici Curiae Colorado Defense Lawyers
Association and Colorado Civil Justice League: Wheeler Law,
P.C. Karen H. Wheeler Jami A. Maul Jesse O. Brant Greenwood
Village, Colorado
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Colorado Trial Lawyers
Association: Western Slope Law Nelson A. Waneka Glenwood
Springs, Colorado
Attorneys for Amici Curiae National Association of Mutual
Insurance Companies and American Property Casualty Insurance
Association: Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP Kendra N.
Beckwith Holly C. White Elizabeth Michaels Denver, Colorado
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Rocky Mountain Association of
Public Insurance Adjusters: Burg Simpson Eldredge Hersh
&Jardine, P.C. D. Dean Batchelder Patrick M. Sweet
Englewood, Colorado
4
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae United Policyholders: Levin
Sitcoff PC Gideon S. Irving Denver, Colorado.
JUSTICE HOOD delivered the Opinion of the Court, in which
CHIEF JUSTICE MARQUEZ, JUSTICE BOATRIGHT, JUSTICE GABRIEL,
JUSTICE SAMOUR, and JUSTICE BLANCO joined. JUSTICE
BERKENKOTTER dissented.
HOOD,
JUSTICE
5
¶1
In this insurance law case, we are confronted with two
distinct issues.
¶2
First, we are asked to construe the breadth of a new statute,
section 10-3-1118, C.R.S. (2025) ("section 1118"),
which proceduralizes how insurers may assert a common-law
failure-to-cooperate defense. We reverse the conclusion below
that the term "failure-to-cooperate defense," as
used in section 1118, encompasses all insurer defenses based
on any of a policyholder's contractual duties. Instead,
we hold that the procedural requirements in section 1118
apply only when the insurer's defense arises from a
policy's general cooperation clause.
¶3
Second, we are asked to determine when an excess
underinsured-motorist ("UIM") insurer is required
to begin its investigation and adjust a claim if the policy
first requires the policyholder to exhaust all underlying
insurance before claiming benefits. Because all UIM
insurers-primary or excess-have a duty to pay their
policyholders' undisputed claims for covered benefits, we
affirm the division's conclusion and hold that if an
excess UIM insurer includes an exhaustion clause in its
policy, that clause is satisfied when a policyholder
demonstrates undisputed damages that exceed the maximum
limits of all the underlying policies.
6
I.
Facts and Procedural History
¶4
In 2017, Anthony Wenzell was rear-ended while driving.
Unfortunately, it wasn't his first accident. He had been
involved in a more serious crash in 2014 and required back
surgery as part of his recovery.
¶5
After the 2017 accident, Wenzell filed claims under three
insurance policies: the tortfeasor's liability policy,
Wenzell's policy with State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance Company ("State Farm"), and a policy with
United Services Autom
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}