All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion May 08, 2026

United States v. Rodriguez-Rascon

── United States v. Rodriguez-Rascon ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Date: May 06, 2026 Category: Direct Criminal Case: 25-11156 Document: 42-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/06/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals No. 25-11156 Fifth Circuit Summary Calendar FILED ____________ May 6, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Alan Armando Rodriguez-Rascon, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:25-CR-132-1 ______________________________ Before Wiener, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alan Armando Rodriguez-Rascon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Rascon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-11156 Document: 42-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/06/2026 No. 25-11156 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 2
CourtListener · May 06, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}