United States v. Padilla-Galarza
── United States v. Padilla-Galarza ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date: May 06, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 22-1950
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
JOSE PADILLA-GALARZA, a/k/a "Joey",
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Silvia L. Carreño-Coll, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Aframe, Hamilton,* and Thompson,
Circuit Judges.
Rafael F. Castro Lang for appellant.
Ann O'Connell Adams, with whom W. Stephen Muldrow, United
States Attorney, Mariana E. Bauzá-Almonte, Assistant United States
Attorney, Chief, Appellate Division, Ricardo A. Imbert-Fernández,
Assistant United States Attorney, and Thomas F. Klumper, Assistant
United States Attorney, Senior Appellate Counsel, were on brief,
for appellee.
May 6, 2026
* Of the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.
AFRAME, Circuit Judge. Following a bench trial, the
district court convicted Jose Padilla-Galarza ("Padilla") of
several counts related to a scheme to steal firearms from a Puerto
Rico police compound.1 The court sentenced Padilla to twenty-five
years in prison. On appeal, Padilla argues that two of his
convictions were time-barred and that several unjustified
discretionary rulings prejudicially tainted the remaining
convictions. We affirm.
I.
Padilla's convictions arose from an October 2010 robbery
of a shooting range located within a Puerto Rico police compound.
During the robbery, two police officers were taken hostage, and
125 firearms were stolen. On October 15, 2015, shortly before the
expiration of the statute of limitations, a grand jury indicted
Padilla for masterminding the robbery and committing several
related crimes. The original indictment charged five counts:
(1) conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery; (2) brandishing and
possessing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence;
(3) stealing firearms; (4) unlicensed dealing in firearms; and
1 The counts of conviction are conspiracy to interfere
with commerce by robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 ("Hobbs Act
conspiracy"); interference with commerce by robbery, id. ("Hobbs
Act robbery"); carrying a firearm during and in relation to the
Hobbs Act robbery, 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i), 2; stealing
firearms, 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(1), 924(a)(2), 2; and being a convicted
felon in possession of firearms, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
- 2 -
(5) being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. The
indictment also charged three co-defendants, all of whom pleaded
guilty before Padilla's trial.
Although the grand jury indicted Padilla in October
2015, he did not face trial until almost seven years later, in
April 2022. The proceedings were initially delayed because of
multiple changes in Padilla's representation between 2015 and
2018. A second delay occurred after the district court allowed a
March 2020 motion for a continuance to an unspecified future date.
During this period, Padilla filed numerous motions and discovery
requests. Eventually, the court set a December 1, 2021, trial date.
The last major delay, until February 2022, occurred when a new
trial judge inherited the case. After Padilla obtained a few more
short continuances, trial was set for April 21, 2022.
Two weeks before trial, the government filed a
superseding indictment based on a change in the law. Count Two of
the original indictment charged Padilla with possessing and
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}