Dored Shiba v. Markwayne Mullin
── Dored Shiba v. Markwayne Mullin ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date: May 05, 2026
Category: General
In the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Seventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-2514
DORED SHIBA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MARKWAYNE MULLIN, *
Secretary of Homeland Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
No. 18-cv-00914 — Martha M. Pacold, Judge.
____________________
ARGUED APRIL 1, 2025 — DECIDED MAY 5, 2026
____________________
Before SYKES, SCUDDER, and KIRSCH, Circuit Judges.
SYKES, Circuit Judge. Dored Shiba suffered a fall at work
two months after starting a new job as an immigration officer
at the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
(“USCIS”), an agency within the Department of Homeland
* We have substituted Markwayne Mullin, the current Secretary of Home-
land Security. See FED. R. APP. P. 43(c)(2).
2 No. 24-2514
Security. He took medical leave, was paid workers’ compen-
sation benefits, and remained off work for more than three
years. When it became clear that he was incapable of return-
ing to work, the agency terminated his employment.
Shiba contested that decision before the Merit Systems
Protection Board, which ordered the USCIS to reinstate him.
His attempted return to work was not successful. His symp-
toms immediately worsened, and he again took medical
leave. When he applied to restart his workers’ compensation
payments, he told the Department of Labor that he was una-
ble to work because the residual infirmities from his original
injury had never improved.
While Shiba was still on leave, the Office of Inspector
General opened an inquiry into his freelance activities repre-
senting refugees before the United Nations Refugee Agency.
After a lengthy investigation, the Inspector General deter-
mined that he had improperly leveraged his federal position
on behalf of Iraqi refugees. The USCIS again fired him.
Shiba sued the Secretary of Homeland Security
challenging his termination and alleging various forms of
disability discrimination in violation of the Rehabilitation
Act. He accused the agency of failing to accommodate his
injury, subjecting him to a hostile work environment, and
retaliating against him. The district court entered summary
judgment for the Secretary on all claims.
Narrowing his focus on appeal, Shiba presses only his ac-
commodation and hostile-workplace claims. As the district
judge correctly held, however, these claims are largely unex-
hausted because Shiba did not timely pursue his administra-
tive remedies. The claims also fail on the merits. We affirm.
No. 24-2514 3
I. Background
Shiba’s tenure as a federal employee began in 1998 when
he was hired as a legal assistant at the Social Security Admin-
istration. In late 2002 he slipped and fell in the bathroom at
work, hitting his head on a sink. Shiba resigned from his po-
sition and applied for Social Security disability benefits. He
also sought and was approved for disability retirement,
which entitled him to a separate annuity from the Office of
Personnel Management.
Shiba reentered the federal work force about four and a
half years later. In April 2007 he started a new job as an immi-
gration information officer in the Chicago field office of the
USCIS. Because he continued to receive his disability annuity,
he was classified in the USCIS employment system as a
“reemployed annuitant.”
In June 2007, just two months after starting his new job,
Shiba slipped and injured his head and back in another bath-
room fall. (The details of the incident
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}