United States v. Rosa-Borges
── United States v. Rosa-Borges ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date: May 01, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
Nos. 24-1841, 24-1842
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
REYNALDO ROSA-BORGES,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Barron, Chief Judge,
Montecalvo and Rikelman, Circuit Judges.
Jessica E. Earl, with whom Rachel Brill, Federal Public
Defender, District of Puerto Rico, Franco L. Pérez-Redondo,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Supervisor, Appellate Division,
and Kevin E. Lerman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, were on
brief, for appellant.
Ricardo A. Imbert-Fernández, Assistant United States
Attorney, with whom W. Stephen Muldrow, United States Attorney,
and Juan Carlos Reyes-Ramos, Assistant United States Attorney,
Chief, Appellate Division, were on brief, for appellee.
May 1, 2026
RIKELMAN, Circuit Judge. These two sentencing appeals
are back at our Court for a second time. See United States v.
Rosa-Borges (Rosa I), 101 F.4th 66 (1st Cir. 2024). Once again,
Reynaldo Rosa-Borges challenges both of his sentences on multiple
grounds. In this chapter, we affirm Rosa's1 revocation sentence
for violating the terms of his supervised release because he has
waived his challenges to that sentence. We conclude, however,
that the district court relied on a legally invalid rationale in
sentencing Rosa for his new conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)
and thus vacate and remand for resentencing in that case.
I. BACKGROUND
We recap the key facts, drawing "from the uncontested
parts of the probation officer's presentence investigation report
(PSR), the plea agreement, and the transcripts of the sentencing
and revocation hearings." Rosa I, 101 F.4th at 68-69 (citation
modified).
In February 2015, Rosa pleaded guilty to possessing a
firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The district court ultimately sentenced him
to five years in prison followed by five years of supervised
release.
1 We refer to the appellant as "Rosa," consistent with his
brief and Spanish naming customs.
- 2 -
After completing his prison sentence in May 2019, Rosa
began serving his supervised release term. In November 2019, the
probation officer notified the district court that Rosa had
violated the terms of his supervised release by possessing
controlled substances and altering a urine sample. The court
"granted an action plan" and allowed his supervision to continue.
In October 2020, the probation officer notified the court that
Rosa had admitted to unlawful use of controlled substances, and
the court modified the conditions of supervision "to include mental
health treatment, to mitigate the risk behavior, and afford needed
social services."
On March 29, 2021, while Rosa was still on supervised
release for his 2015 conviction, he ran into trouble again. Police
officers patrolling a beach saw him and another individual sitting
in the back of an SUV, under its open trunk door, with a firearm
in reach inside the trunk. The officers detained both men and
seized from the SUV a loaded 7.62 caliber Norinco "AK-type pistol"
and other items, including an ammunition magazine containing 30
rounds of 7.62 caliber ammunition. The next day, March 30,
officers conducted a search at the house where Rosa lived with his
aunt. The search yielded two rifle mag
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}