All States › Evidence
Neutral Court Opinion May 05, 2026

United States v. Jamar Green

── United States v. Jamar Green ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Date: May 01, 2026 Category: General USCA4 Appeal: 25-6932 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/01/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6932 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMAR GREEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:20-cr-00001-MSD-LRL-1) Submitted: April 28, 2026 Decided: May 1, 2026 Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamar Green, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6932 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/01/2026 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jamar Green appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s finding that Green did not establish extraordinary and compelling reasons for release. See United States v. Davis, 99 F.4th 647, 653 (4th Cir. 2024) (stating standard of review). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Green, No. 4:20-cr-00001-MSD-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. July 22, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
CourtListener · May 01, 2026
Original link
Share on X Share on Facebook
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own address as its source and its own type. #}