George Trombetti v. Borough of Aldan

── George Trombetti v. Borough of Aldan ── Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Date: April 29, 2026 Category: General NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 25-2556 __________ GEORGE F. TROMBETTI; DESAREE R. ICZKOWSKI, Appellants v. BOROUGH OF ALDAN; DELAWARE COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU; JOHN WHITE, Borough Manager, Aldan; KAREN DUFFY, Tax Bureau Manager; STEVEN ZIVIELLO, Chief of Aldan Police Department; OFFICER ANDREW DURIS, Aldan Police Department; OFFICER KENNETH COPPOLA, JR., Aldan Police Department; OFFICER RYAN BELL, Aldan Police Department; OFFICER ZAHNER, Aldan Police Department; DAVID CLARK, Foreclosure Purchaser, Associated with Nathan Goode; JAMES F. BURGER; DAVE SMITH, Plaintiff’s Uncle, Aldan Borough Associate; THERESE SMITH, Plaintiff’s Aunt, Law Enforcement Contact; BILLY PLYMOUTH, Property Pal Fraud Plaintiff with David Clark; JOHN GOULD, Clifton Heights Emergency Management; NATHAN KRAUTHAMER; THERESE M. BURGER; NATHAN GOODE ____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 2:25-cv-01362) District Judge: Honorable Mark A. Kearney ____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) April 17, 2026 Before: MATEY, MONGTOMERY-REEVES, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed April 29, 2026) ___________  OPINION* ___________ PER CURIAM George Trombetti and his fiancée, Desaree Iczkowski, appeal pro se and in forma pauperis from the District Court’s order dismissing their amended complaint with prejudice. We will affirm. I. Trombetti and Iczkowski (“Plaintiffs” or “Appellants”) initiated this matter in March 2025 by filing a threadbare complaint and a series of supplemental memoranda, affidavits, and exhibits (collectively exceeding 2,100 pages) alleging a grand conspiracy between nearly two dozen Pennsylvania state actors, estranged family members, and private individuals to, inter alia, fraudulently procure his late mother’s organs following her death in Florida and to foreclose upon his home in Aldan Borough, Delaware County. Plaintiffs invoked 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the National Defense Authorization Act’s (“NDAA”) whistleblower protections, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and numerous federal criminal statues; they also asserted more than a dozen claims under Pennsylvania law. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania screened their complaint and supplemental filings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), dismissed the bulk of their * This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. 2 federal claims without prejudice for noncompliance with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,1 declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their common-law claims, and granted them leave to amend, which they did.2 Plaintiffs’ amended complaint was nearly twice as long as the original, but it fared little better. They added to their initial pleadings new allegations of, among other things, healthcare fraud and “clinical homicide,” as well as violations of Florida law, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), and the Racketeer Influenced Corruption Organizations (“