Richard Thivener v. Andrew Nero
── Richard Thivener v. Andrew Nero ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date: April 29, 2026
Category: General
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 25-2240
RICHARD THIVENER,
Appellant
v.
ANDREW NERO, PETER LARGEY, THOMAS NICKLAS,
GREGG MCMANUS, PHILIP HOH, MICHELLE MUCCIO,
THOMAS COPPOLO, ANTHONY PISTNER, COUNTY OF ELK
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Pennsylvania
(District Court No. 1:22-cv-00238)
District Judge: Honorable Cathy Bissoon
Submitted under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)
March 26, 2026
Before: HARDIMAN, SCIRICA, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: April 29, 2026)
___________
OPINION *
___________
AMBRO, Circuit Judge
The District Attorney’s Office in Elk County, Pennsylvania charged Richard Thivener
with homicide, drug delivery resulting in death, and reckless endangerment after he
confessed to killing his wife, Jessica Thivener. Its Court of Common Pleas suppressed the
evidence of his confession and dismissed the charges without prejudice. Thivener brought
this action against the state officials responsible for investigating and prosecuting him. His
complaint alleges that officers unlawfully coerced his confession, seized evidence from his
home in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and arrested and charged him without
probable cause. The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
granted summary judgment for the defendants on all claims. Thivener appealed. For the
reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
In the early morning hours of July 26, 2020, Thivener sent a text message to Wendy
Catalano—the mother of his wife, Jessica—stating that “Jess[ica] and I have committed
suicide together.” App. 543a. The message instructed Catalano to “come find us before the
kids wake up.” Id. Catalano rushed to the Thiveners’ home. When she arrived, she
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
2
discovered her daughter’s lifeless body on the bed in the master bedroom. She was fully
naked except for a bra that was pulled up, revealing her breasts. Her legs were spread open,
her underwear was on the floor, and two bottles of sexual lubricant were next to the bed
where Jessica lay. She had spots of blood and lubricant on her body. Thivener was still
alive, laying on the bed next to Jessica’s body. Catalano called the police.
Chief Thomas Nicklas and Sergeant Peter Largey of the City of St. Mary’s Police
Department responded to the call. Chief Nicklas remained near the home’s front door to
monitor who entered and left while Sergeant Largey went to the master bedroom. The latter
testified that he observed Thivener “laying on his side” with his eyes closed, and that he
would “periodically” open them to “glar[e]” at Jessica. App. 594a. EMS personnel arrived
shortly thereafter to treat Thivener. He was generally non-responsive to their questions,
stating only that he had taken “medicine” that night. App. 619a. They removed him from
the bedroom and took him to the hospital.
Sergeant Largey called Patrolman Andrew Nero to process the scene. When Nero
arrived, he and Largey disagreed about whether they should seek a warrant before
searching the home. Nero testified that their “focus” at that point was to determine which
medications Thivener had taken that night so they could give the information to the medical
professionals treating him. App. 627a. The officers called Elk County District Attorney
Thomas Coppolo to ask how they should proceed. He told them to “process the scene.”
App. 497, 4056. Th
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}