United States v. Larry Douglas McPherson
── United States v. Larry Douglas McPherson ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date: May 04, 2026
Category: NEW
USCA11 Case: 25-12539 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 05/04/2026 Page: 1 of 9
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 25-12539
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARRY DOUGLAS MCPHERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00132-CG-N-1
____________________
Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Larry McPherson, proceeding pro se, appeals the district
court’s orders denying his motion for compassionate release, under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), and his motion for redacted copies of
USCA11 Case: 25-12539 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 05/04/2026 Page: 2 of 9
2 Opinion of the Court 25-12539
victim-impact statements that were submitted under seal by the
government in opposition to his motion. He argues that the dis-
trict court abused its discretion by denying his motions without
providing any reasons for its rulings. We agree that the record does
not permit meaningful review of the court’s decisions, so we vacate
and remand for further proceedings.
I.
In 2011, a federal jury convicted McPherson of attempted
enticement of a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activity, see 18
U.S.C. § 2422(b); attempted production of child pornography, see
id. § 2251(a) & (e); and possession of child pornography, see id.
§ 2252A(A)(5)(B). The district court sentenced McPherson to 235
months of imprisonment, at the low end of the guideline range of
235 to 293 months. To explain its decision, the court cited the mit-
igating factors of McPherson’s physical and mental condition and
age (68 at sentencing). We affirmed his convictions on direct ap-
peal. See United States v. McPherson, 587 F. App’x 556, 563 (11th Cir.
2014).
The information before the district court at sentencing re-
flected that McPherson suffered from extensive health problems,
including diabetes, high blood pressure, and non-obstructive coro-
nary artery disease. The report noted that McPherson’s conditions
put him at a risk for serious health problems like heart attack, heart
failure, or stroke.
In 2021, McPherson filed a counseled motion for compas-
sionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) based on his age
USCA11 Case: 25-12539 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 05/04/2026 Page: 3 of 9
25-12539 Opinion of the Court 3
(79), extensive health conditions, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
The district court denied the motion. The court found that
McPherson “already suffered from most of his medical conditions
when he was sentenced for his crimes and that his conditions are
well managed.” And it observed that the medical records “fail to
corroborate that McPherson’s age is causing a serious deterioration
of his health or that his conditions prevent him from providing self-
care within prison.” The court further concluded that, even assum-
ing McPherson was eligible for relief, the § 3553(a) f
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}