White v. Fifth Third Bank
── White v. Fifth Third Bank ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: April 27, 2026
Category: Private Civil Diversity
Case: 25-40647 Document: 40-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/27/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 25-40647 FILED
April 27, 2026
Summary Calendar
____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Zachary-Wayne White,
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
Fifth Third Bank, National Association; Mackie Wolf
Zientz & Mann, P.C. Law Firm; AVT Title Services,
L.L.C.; Fannie Mae as Trustee for Securitized Trust
FNMA 2020-009 Trust,
Defendants—Appellees.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:23-CV-847
______________________________
Before Davis, Wilson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
Plaintiff-Appellant Zachary-Wayne White, proceeding pro se,
brought this suit against various entities connected to the foreclosure of his
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-40647 Document: 40-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/27/2026
No. 25-40647
home. The district court found improper joinder as to some defendants and
granted summary judgment for the remaining defendants. We AFFIRM.
White and his wife obtained a loan secured by a mortgage on their
home from Great Western Financial Services, Inc. The Note expressly
provided that “the Lender may transfer this Note.” Great Western
thereafter endorsed the note to Defendant-Appellee, Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Fifth Third, in turn, transferred ownership of the loan to Defendant-
Appellee Fannie Mae, although it continued servicing the loan.
White defaulted on his mortgage and Fifth Third noticed the property
for foreclosure. White alleges he tried to satisfy the debt with a “silver surety
bond” he created on his own. Fifth Third did not accept the “bond” in lieu
of payment and proceeded with the foreclosure sale. Defendant-Appellee
Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann P.C. served as counsel for Fifth Third in the
foreclosure proceeding and Defendant-Appellee AVT Title Services LLC
acted as substitute foreclosure trustee.
White sued in state court, alleging that the foreclosure was wrongful
and bringing a variety of claims. Defendants removed to federal court
invoking diversity jurisdiction. They noted that Mackie Wolf and AVT Title
are non-diverse but alleged that these parties had been improperly joined.
Acting on the recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court
dismissed the suit. It agreed that Mackie Wolf and AVT Title had been
improperly joined and held that White had failed to advance viable legal
theories against Fifth Third and Fannie Mae such that summary judgment
was proper. White timely appealed.
First, White challenges the conclusion that Mackie Wolf and AVT
Title were improperly joined such that their citizenship could be disregarded
when assessing diversity jurisdiction. A party has been improperly joined if
the court conducts a “Rule 12(b)(6)-type analysis” and determines that the
2
Case: 25-40647 Document: 40-1 Page: 3 Date Filed:
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}