Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Ins
── Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Ins ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: April 28, 2026
Category: Private Civil Federal
Case: 24-40323 Document: 187-2 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
_____________ FILED
April 28, 2026
No. 24-40323
_____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Aramark Services, Incorporated Group Health Plan;
Aramark Services Incorporated, formerly known as Aramark
Corporation; Aramark Uniform Services, Group Health and
Welfare Plan; Aramark Benefits Compliance Review
Committee,
Plaintiffs—Appellees,
versus
Aetna Life Insurance Company,
Defendant—Appellant.
________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:23-CV-446
________________________________
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion December 18, 2025, 5 Cir.,162 F. 4th 532)
Before Elrod, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart,
Richman, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson,
Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson,
Douglas, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.
Case: 24-40323 Document: 187-2 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2026
No. 24-40323
Per Curiam:
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for
rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service
and not disqualified having voted in favor,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en
banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will
specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to
5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated December 18, 2025,
is VACATED.
2
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}