United States v. Gonzalez-Agundis
── United States v. Gonzalez-Agundis ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: April 30, 2026
Category: Direct Criminal
Case: 25-40057 Document: 66-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 25-40057 FILED
April 30, 2026
____________
Lyle W. Cayce
United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Adrian Gonzalez-Agundis,
Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:24-CR-1467-1
______________________________
Before Stewart, Engelhardt, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
Adrian Gonzalez-Agundis brandished a knife during an encounter
with a law enforcement officer. This appeal concerns whether the district
court erred in finding that Gonzalez-Agundis intended to harm the officer
and sentencing him under the guideline for aggravated assault. Finding no
clear error, we AFFIRM.
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-40057 Document: 66-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/30/2026
No. 25-40057
I.
Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) agents were investigating
suspected unauthorized entries by people near the southern border. One of
the individuals, Gonzalez-Agundis, fled towards the Rio Grande River, and a
CBP agent pursued him. As the agent approached, Gonzalez-Agundis
stopped, pulled out a knife, and—with the knife in his hand—turned towards
the agent in a threatening manner. The agent told him to drop the knife
several times, but he refused. The agent tased Gonzalez-Agundis, making
him drop to the ground. The agent tried to gain control of Gonzalez-Agundis,
but he resisted and, after being tased a second time, continued resisting. As
the struggle continued, the agent drive-stunned Gonzalez-Agundis and was
then able to restrain him.
Gonzalez-Agundis pleaded guilty to illegal reentry, in violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b), and assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers
engaged in official duties with a deadly or dangerous weapon, in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) and (b).
The presentence investigation report (PSR) calculated a guidelines
range of 57 to 71 months’ imprisonment. Relevant here, the probation officer
calculated the § 111 offense level by looking to U.S.S.G. § 2A2.4 and
determining that the cross-reference to U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2 should apply
because the charged conduct constituted aggravated assault. Gonzalez-
Agundis objected to the PSR, arguing that no facts supported finding that he
intended to cause bodily injury with the knife. The district court overruled
his objection, finding that the totality of the circumstances indicated that
Gonzalez-Agundis intended to cause bodily harm.
The district court varied downwards and sentenced Gonzalez-
Agundis to 42 months’ imprisonment and two years’ supervised release.
Gonzalez-Agundis timely appealed his sentence.
2
Case: 25-40057 Document: 66-1 Page: 3 Date Filed: 04/30/2026
No. 25-40057
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}