United States v. Derek Dixon
── United States v. Derek Dixon ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date: April 29, 2026
Category: NEW
USCA11 Case: 25-10838 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 04/29/2026 Page: 1 of 8
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 25-10838
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DEREK DIXON,
a.k.a. Eric,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 9:05-cr-80107-DPG-1
____________________
Before ROSENBAUM, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Derek Dixon appeals the district court’s denial of his 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction based on
USCA11 Case: 25-10838 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 04/29/2026 Page: 2 of 8
2 Opinion of the Court 25-10838
Amendment 821 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The govern-
ment has moved for summary affirmance, arguing that the court
properly exercised its discretion to deny a reduction. Because the
government’s position is clearly right as a matter of law and there
is no substantial question as to the outcome of the case, we grant
the government’s motion and affirm the denial of Dixon’s §
3582(c)(2) motion.
I.
In 2007, Dixon pled guilty under a written plea agreement
to two counts of carjacking and one count of possession of a fire-
arm by a convicted felon. The government agreed to dismiss the
remaining nine counts. The parties jointly recommended the max-
imum possible prison sentence of 480 months. Dixon agreed that
480 months was a “reasonable sentence based on the factors listed
in [18 U.S.C. §] 3553(a).”
Undisputed facts in Dixon’s presentence investigation report
(“PSR”) show that, over several months in 2004, Dixon participated
in a violent crime spree involving carjackings, robberies, homi-
cides, and unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition. Over
a few months, when he was nineteen years old, Dixon committed
two armed carjackings, pistol-whipping victims both times, and
killed four people in two separate drive-by shootings, among other
conduct. At the time of these offenses, Dixon was on probation for
shooting at three victims in a moving vehicle.
The PSR recommended a total offense level of 40 and a crim-
inal-history category of III, which yielded a guideline range of 360
USCA11 Case: 25-10838 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 04/29/2026 Page: 3 of 8
25-10838 Opinion of the Court 3
months to life. The statutory maximums reduced the top of the
guideline range to 480 months.
The district court imposed the maximum possible sentence
of 480 months of imprisonment. Given the extremely “serious”
and “violent” nature of the offenses, the court found that a sen-
tence at the high end of the guideline range was appropriate. It
appears Dixon did not file a direct appeal. As for Dixon’s motion
to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the court dismissed
it as time barred. Then, in 2021, the district court denied Dixon’s
motion for compassionate release
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}