Friedman v. Central Maine Power Company
── Friedman v. Central Maine Power Company ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date: April 29, 2026
Category: General
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 25-1578
ED FRIEDMAN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. John C. Nivison, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
Before
Barron, Chief Judge,
Howard and Rikelman, Circuit Judges.
William Most, with whom David Lanser and Most & Associates
were on brief, for appellant.
Christopher C. Taintor, with whom Russell B. Pierce, Jr., and
Norman, Hanson & DeTroy, LLC were on brief, for appellee.
April 29, 2026
RIKELMAN, Circuit Judge. Central Maine Power Company
(CMP) uses digital "smart meters" to track its customers'
electricity usage. Ed Friedman, a former CMP customer who suffers
from a rare and incurable form of blood cancer, seeks to keep his
analog meter, claiming that radiation emitted from smart meters
poses risks to his health. After CMP declined to waive the fee
for retaining an analog meter, Friedman sued CMP for disability
discrimination.
The district court granted summary judgment to CMP,
concluding that Friedman had failed to marshal enough evidence to
go to trial on a critical issue: the alleged causal connection
between radiofrequency radiation from smart meters and Friedman's
cancer symptoms. We agree with the district court's ruling and
thus affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Relevant Facts1
Friedman, a resident of Bowdoinham, Maine, suffers from
lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, a rare form of blood cancer. Because
there is no cure, his treatment has focused on palliative care to
mitigate the effects of his disease.
1 "Inreviewing the district court's decision granting summary
judgment to [CMP], we recite the facts in the record in the light
most favorable to [Friedman] and draw all reasonable inferences
from those facts in [his] favor." Cruz-Cedeño v. Vega-Moral, 150
F.4th 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2025).
- 2 -
For many years, Friedman was a customer of CMP, which
provides electricity service to Maine residents. CMP measures
residential electricity usage through meters typically placed on
the outside of its customers' homes.
In 2010, CMP received approval from the Maine Public
Utilities Commission (MPUC) to implement Advanced Metering
Infrastructure (AMI). AMI permits automated and remote meter
reading, tracks and stores customer-usage data, and allows
communications to and from customers' meters. AMI devices,
including the new digital smart meters, transmit data via
radiofrequency (RF) signals.
Shortly after approving the AMI proposal, MPUC received
an initial complaint alleging that RF radiation emitted from AMI
meters could potentially cause cancer. In response, MPUC directed
CMP to allow customers to opt out of AMI but instructed it to
charge such customers the incremental costs of the alternative
metering. In the order it issued in 2011, MPUC expressly stated
that it was not addressing the merits of the health concerns raised
in the complaint.
Based on MPUC's order, CMP permitted customers to opt
out of the AMI program by using either their existing analog
meters -- which do not emit any RF radiation -- or the new smart
meters in a non-transmitting mode. CMP also instituted an opt-out
fee: As of 2023, a customer who elected to keep their analog meter
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}