Kristopher Lee Vickroy v. State of Arkansas
── Kristopher Lee Vickroy v. State of Arkansas ──
Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date: April 29, 2026
Category: General
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 260
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION III
No. CR-25-597
KRISTOPHER LEE VICKROY Opinion Delivered April 29, 2026
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE VAN BUREN
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
V. [NO. 71CR-23-110]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE H.G. FOSTER, JUDGE
APPELLEE
AFFIRMED
CASEY R. TUCKER, Judge
A Van Buren County Circuit Court jury convicted appellant Kristopher Vickroy of
rape. On appeal, he asserts that the circuit court erred in admitting the testimony of a
nonvictim child witness (MV2) under the pedophile exception to Arkansas Rule of Evidence
404(b). In a subpoint, Vickroy argues that the admission of the nonvictim child witness’s
testimony violated Arkansas Rule of Evidence 403 due to unfair prejudice. We affirm.
I. Factual Background
On September 14, 2023, the State charged Vickroy with rape pursuant Arkansas
Code Annotated section 5-14-103 (Supp. 2023), alleging that he engaged in sexual
intercourse or deviate sexual activity with another person who was under the age of fourteen
by forcible compulsion. The State later amended the information to allege that Vickroy
violated Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-14-103(a)(3)(A) in that on September 4, 2023,
he engaged in deviate sexual activity with a minor victim (MV1), a person less than fourteen
years of age, thereby committing the offense of rape. The case proceeded to trial on April
22, 2025.
The evidence at trial was that Vickroy was MV1’s older cousin (MV1’s mother is his
first cousin). Vickroy was approximately twenty-five years older than MV1. In September
2023, when MV1 was eleven years old, several family members, including Vickroy, went on
a family camping trip in Missouri. Vickroy drove MV1; his niece; and his niece’s friend,
MV2, to their respective homes after the trip. After dropping off the other girls, Vickroy
told MV1 that he needed to stop by his house in Fairfield Bay because he needed to use the
restroom. After Vickroy went inside and did not return, MV1 entered the house to get a
drink of water. While she was in the house, Vickroy called to her from his bedroom where
he was lying on the bed and asked her to come into the bedroom. MV1 stated she did not
want to, but Vickroy insisted, so she went into his bedroom. He then pulled her onto the
bed with him and proceeded to put his hand inside her pants and digitally penetrate her
vagina. MV1 testified that she was screaming at Vickroy to stop and get off of her. He
stopped when she kicked him, and MV1 ran out of the house and returned to his truck.
Once he was inside the truck, Vickroy offered MV1 money in exchange for her
silence. He told her that if she told anyone what he had done it would ruin his life. MV1
asked Vickroy to take her home. On their way from Fairfield Bay to the Vilonia area, they
drove past MV1’s grandmother’s house in Clinton. Vickroy refused MV1’s request to take
her to her grandmother. MV1 began texting her mother, asking for help. She told her that
2
Vickroy had touched her inappropriately and that she was scared. Her mother instructed
her to act normal and just get home. When she arrived home, MV1 went to her mother’s
bedroom, crawled into her mother’s bed, and cried.
After MV1 told her mother what had happened in more detail, MV1’s mother
contacted Vickroy through Facebook Messenger. He denied that he had done anything to
MV1, claiming he had accidentally touched her breast while they were playing. MV1’s
m
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}