Cope v. Bisignano
── Cope v. Bisignano ──
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date: April 27, 2026
Category: General
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 27 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KATRINA LE ANNE COPE, No. 25-2337
D.C. No.
Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:24-cv-05513-MLP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Michelle L. Peterson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 23, 2026**
Seattle, Washington
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, W. FLETCHER and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Katrina Le Anne Cope (“Cope”) appeals the district court’s decision
affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for
Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. § 1382c(a)(3). We review the district court’s decision “de novo, and we
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
will not overturn the Commissioner’s decision ‘unless it is either not supported by
substantial evidence or is based upon legal error.’” Woods v. Kijakazi, 32 F.4th
785, 788 (9th Cir. 2022) (quoting Luther v. Berryhill, 891 F.3d 872, 875 (9th Cir.
2018)). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
1. The ALJ articulated clear and convincing reasons for rejecting Cope’s
symptom testimony. See Smartt v. Kijakazi, 53 F.4th 489, 499 (9th Cir. 2022).
Here, the ALJ considered Cope’s testimony that she had severe pain, depression,
anxiety, and PTSD symptoms that precluded her from working, interacting with
others, and performing daily activities outside her home. Although the ALJ found
that Cope’s “medically determinable impairments could reasonably be expected to
cause the alleged symptoms,” the ALJ declined to fully credit Cope’s testimony
because it was inconsistent with the other evidence in the record.
The ALJ described inconsistencies between Cope’s testimony and the
objective medical evidence, noting that imaging and physical examinations showed
only mild to moderate abnormalities and “unremarkable” findings, and that during
examinations, “despite [Cope’s] complaints, she was often observed in no acute
distress, or looked well and comfortable.” The ALJ further noted that Cope’s
treatment remained conservative and appeared effective, “although she was not
always compliant with taking prescribed medication.”
The ALJ also found that Cope’s subjective complaints were inconsistent
2 25-2337
with her improvement over time and her recent activity level. As to Cope’s
improvement over time, the ALJ noted that Cope had “variability in [her]
symptoms” but “demonstrated significant improvement in 2023.” The ALJ
described Cope’s progression of symptoms from May 2020 through May 2023,
which was interspersed with addiction to drugs.
Cope’s activities that demonstrated improvement over time included Cope’s
caretaking for her mother, which included taking her mother to Seattle for
treatment; Cope’s work and volunteer activities, as evidenced by Cope’s report
“that she was very busy performing volunteer work with the Salvation Army up to
40 hours per week,” “worked for a
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}