In re C.B.
── In re C.B. ──
Court: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date: April 24, 2026
Category: General
2026 IL App (4th) 251291-U
NOTICE FILED
This Order was filed under April 24, 2026
Supreme Court Rule 23 and is NO. 4-25-1291
Carla Bender
not precedent except in the
4th District Appellate
limited circumstances allowed IN THE APPELLATE COURT
under Rule 23(e)(1). Court, IL
OF ILLINOIS
FOURTH DISTRICT
In re C.B., a Minor ) Appeal from the
) Circuit Court of
(The People of the State of Illinois, ) Tazewell County
Petitioner-Appellee, ) No. 25JA48
v. )
Andrea Z., ) Honorable
Respondent-Appellant). ) Katherine G. P. Legge,
) Judge Presiding.
JUSTICE LANNERD delivered the judgment of the court.
Justices Doherty and DeArmond concurred in the judgment.
ORDER
¶1 Held: The appellate court granted appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirmed
the trial court’s judgment, concluding no issue of arguable merit could be raised on
appeal.
¶2 In April 2025, the State filed a petition pursuant to section 2-3(1)(b) of the Juvenile
Court Act of 1987 (Juvenile Court Act) (705 ILCS 405/2-3(1)(b) (West 2024)), alleging C.B. (born
October 2010), the child of respondent, Andrea Z., and Joshua B., was a neglected minor. (When
the State filed its petition, C.B. was in the custody of his grandmother, Melinda R., who served as
his short-term guardian. Melinda R.’s guardianship was vacated by the trial court, and she is not a
party to this appeal.) Following a joint adjudicatory and dispositional hearing, the court entered
orders adjudicating C.B. neglected and finding respondent fit but unable to care for C.B.
Respondent timely filed a notice of appeal, and counsel was appointed to represent her. (Joshua B.,
who was found unfit and unwilling, is not a party to this appeal.) Respondent’s counsel now moves
to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), contending “an appeal in this
case would be meritless.” See In re S.M., 314 Ill. App. 3d 682, 685 (2000) (holding Anders “applies
to findings of parental unfitness and termination of parental rights”). We agree and grant counsel’s
motion to withdraw and affirm the court’s judgment.
¶3 I. BACKGROUND
¶4 A. The State’s Shelter Care Petition
¶5 On April 8, 2025, the State filed a petition alleging C.B. was a neglected minor
pursuant to section 2-3(1)(b) of the Juvenile Court Act (705 ILCS 405/2-3(1)(b) (West 2024)). We
note portions of the petition were later stricken by the State without objection. Because of this, we
have omitted references to those portions of the petition below. The remaining portions of the
petition alleged:
“a. On or about March 20, 2025, [the Illinois Department of Children and
Family Services (DCFS)] received an online referral for service assessment for the
family due to reported concerns including that [C.B.] had missed multiple medical
appointments, that [C.B.] was discharged from his [primary
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}