McFarland v. State
── McFarland v. State ──
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date: April 21, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court
Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the
opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any
prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and
official text of the opinion.
In the
Supreme Court of Georgia
No. S26A0403
Travis McFarland
v.
The State
On Appeal from the Superior Court of Troup County
No. 22R0639
Decided: April 21, 2026
ELLINGTON, Justice.
A Troup County jury found Travis McFarland guilty of fel-
ony murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting
death of James Ponder. 1 McFarland contends the evidence was
1 The crimes occurred on February 9, 2022. On September 7, 2022, a
Troup County grand jury indicted McFarland for violating provisions of the
Street Gang Act (Counts 1 and 2); felony murder (predicated upon aggravated
assault with a deadly weapon) (Count 3); aggravated assault with a deadly
weapon (Count 4); felony murder (predicated upon criminal attempt to commit
armed robbery) (Count 5); criminal attempt to commit armed robbery (Count
6); and possession of firearm during the commission of a felony (Count 7). After
a trial that commenced on September 26, the jury found McFarland guilty on
all counts. On October 5, 2022, the trial court sentenced McFarland to serve
life in prison for felony murder (Count 3) and merged the conviction for aggra-
vated assault (Count 4) into the Count 3 felony murder conviction, while the
remaining felony murder conviction (Count 5) was vacated by operation of law.
The court then imposed a 20-year prison term for each violation of the Street
Gang Act, with the sentence for Count 1 to run consecutive to his life sentence
under Count 3 and his sentence for Count 2 to run consecutive to his sentence
for Count 1; a 30-year prison term for his criminal attempt to commit armed
insufficient to support his convictions for violating the Street
Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act (the “Street Gang Act”),
OCGA § 16-15-1 et seq. He also contends the trial court erred in
refusing to give McFarland’s requested jury instruction on justi-
fication and that his trial counsel provided constitutionally inef-
fective assistance. As explained below, we discern no reversible
error.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdicts,
the evidence showed the following. On February 9, 2022, Ponder
made arrangements through McFarland’s cousin to buy a hand-
gun and some marijuana for $250. At around 8:00 p.m., Ponder
and his friend, Trevor Sturkie, drove to 909 Troup Street in Troup
County to meet the seller. Ponder drove his Honda Civic, and
Sturkie sat in the passenger seat. Upon arriving, as Ponder was
getting out of his car, Sturkie observed a car slowly passing by
them. The passenger in that car was peering at them through his
open window. Ponder went to the house at 909 Troup Street, but
returned without having completed the transaction.
Two men accompanied Ponder as he returned to his car. As
Ponder got in the driver’s seat, the two men, one of whom was
later identified as McFarland, got in the back. Ponder told Sturkie
that he was “going to give [the men] a ride down the street.”
Sturki
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}