Painter v. State
── Painter v. State ──
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date: April 21, 2026
Category: General
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court
Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the
opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any
prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and
official text of the opinion.
In the
Supreme Court of Georgia
No. S26A0382
Gregory Painter
v.
The State
On Appeal from the Superior Court of Fulton County
No. 20SC176843
Decided: April 21, 2026
BETHEL, Justice.
Gregory Painter was convicted of malice murder and other
crimes in connection with the shooting death of his father, James
Painter. 1 On appeal, Painter raises only one argument: that the
trial court erred by denying his request to instruct the jury on his
sole defense of insanity. Because there was not even slight
evidence to support giving the instructions he requested, Painter
has failed to establish error, so we affirm.
1 The crimes occurred on April 16, 2020. On November 20, 2020, a
Fulton County grand jury indicted Painter for malice murder (Count 1), felony
murder (Count 2), aggravated assault (Count 3), and possession of a firearm
during the commission of a felony (Count 4). At a November 2024 jury trial,
Painter was found guilty on all counts. The court sentenced Painter to serve
life in prison without the possibility of parole on Count 1 and a consecutive
term of five years on Count 4. The remaining counts were vacated or merged.
Painter filed a timely motion for new trial on November 14, 2024, which was
later amended. The parties waived a hearing, and the trial court denied the
motion, as amended, on September 10, 2025. Painter then filed a timely notice
of appeal, and his case was docketed to this Court’s term beginning in
December 2025 and submitted for a decision on the briefs.
1. The evidence at trial showed the following. On April 16,
2020, Painter and James began arguing over text messages that
Painter had sent to his sister’s friend and that James considered
inappropriate. Painter had been drinking and reportedly had a
history of mental illness. Painter’s mother heard Painter yelling
and came into the living room where Painter and James were
arguing, at which point Painter began yelling and directing
profanities at her. James then told her to go into the kitchen and
told Painter to go upstairs to his room to rest, but Painter
continued yelling. Painter’s mother told Painter that he needed to
calm down or they were going to call the police. The argument
culminated in Painter yelling at James about an affair James
participated in a decade earlier before producing a handgun and
shooting James in the face seven times, killing him.
Immediately following the shooting, Painter’s mother
called 911 and asked Painter what he was going to do, to which
Painter responded, “Don’t worry, Mom. It’s going to be okay.”
Painter then picked up some of the shell casings, went upstairs
with the handgun, returned downstairs without the handgun,
and went outside to smoke until police arrived. When police
arrived, Painter was calm and compliant as they placed him
under arrest. Police found multiple shell casi
{# E23 (Nick, ruling section 1 answer 10): quoting a bill or a court opinion works
the way quoting a news article works. Select a passage above and the same panel
opens: the passage goes to the official you choose, with this document's own
address as its source and its own type. #}